Social Sport Feedback - Semester 2, 2011 Survey

Question Title

1. Did you join the Griffith University Social Sport Program as an individual or as part of a team?

Individual

Team

Question Title

2. What sport did you participate in during Semester 2 Social Sport Competition?

Men's Soccer

Mixed Soccer

Women's Netball

Mixed Netball

Mixed Touch

Mixed Basketball

Question Title

3. In which of the below categories do you belong?

Griffith University Student

Other Student

Griffith University Staff

General Public

Question Title

4. How many seasons have you participated in the Griffith University Social Sport Program?

Question Title

5. How did you hear about our competitions?

Griffith Uni Website

Student Diary

Posters on Campus

Friend or Word of Mouth

Previous Participant

Question Title

6. Please rate the following based on your experience.

	Unsatisfactory	Poor	Adequate	Good	Excellent
Registration Process	Registration Process Unsatisfactory	Registration Process Poor	Registration Process Adequate	Registration Process Good	Registration Process Excellent
Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc)	Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc) Unsatisfactory	Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc) Poor	Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc) Adequate	Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc) Good	Communication about competition information (fixtures, rules, etc) Excellent
Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor	Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor Unsatisfactory	Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor Poor	Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor Adequate	Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor Good	Efficiency of game day operations by sport convenor Excellent
Quality of referees	Quality of referees Unsatisfactory	Quality of referees Poor	Quality of referees Adequate	Quality of referees Good	Quality of referees Excellent
Standard of equipment used	Standard of equipment used Unsatisfactory	Standard of equipment used Poor	Standard of equipment used Adequate	Standard of equipment used Good	Standard of equipment used Excellent
Value for money (cost per player, per game)	Value for money (cost per player, per game) Unsatisfactory	Value for money (cost per player, per game) Poor	Value for money (cost per player, per game) Adequate	Value for money (cost per player, per game) Good	Value for money (cost per player, per game) Excellent
How on field issues/disputes were dealt with	How on field issues/disputes were dealt with Unsatisfactory	How on field issues/disputes were dealt with Poor	How on field issues/disputes were dealt with Adequate	How on field issues/disputes were dealt with Good	How on field issues/disputes were dealt with Excellent
Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking)	Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking) Unsatisfactory	Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking) Poor	Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking) Adequate	Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking) Good	Facilities available(ovals, courts, line marking) Excellent

Further comments

Question Title

7. In your opinion how can the following elements of the competition be improved?

Registration process

Communication about competition information

Game day operations (including signing in)

Facilities available

Question Title

8. Do you intend on participating in the Semester 1, 2012 competition?

Yes

Maybe

If no, why?

Question Title

9. Would you like to see your chosen sport played on any other specific day/night? (I.e. Mixed soccer on Sunday) If so, please suggest changes you would like to see.

Question Title

10. Thank you for filling out the survey. If you would like to add any comments that cannot be answered from the above questions please write them here.