Symposium Speaker Evaluation

 
 50% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. How would you rate the session, "Can We Talk? A Media Doctor's Take on Communicating with Stroke Patients" by Dr. Brian Goldman? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
WORKSHOP SESSIONS - (Only evaluate the workshops you attended)

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate Workshop 1, "Five Essential Strategies in Motivating Patients to Change" by Marilyn Herie and Fatim Ajwani? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Marilyn Herie - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Fatim Ajwani - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate Workshop 2, "How to Expand Your Listening Capabilities and Become a More Effective Communicator" by Paul Byrne? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate Workshop 3, "Translation Please! Applying Current Concepts in Knowledge Translation to Accelerate Research Findings into Clinical Practice" by Lou Biasin, Liz Inness, and Nancy Salbach? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Lou Biasin -Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Liz Inness - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Nancy Salbach - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate Workshop 4, "Teaching and Mentoring Students for Effective Communication in Stroke Care" by Donna Barker, Laurie Bernick, Lynn Ellwood, Brenda Mori, and Rachel Stack? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Donna Barker - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Laurie Bernick - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Lynn Ellwood - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Brenda Mori - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Rachel Stack - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate the Panel Discussion, "The Importance of Communication in Stroke Care across the Continuum: Learning from Negative and Positive Communication Experiences"? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Joanna Mackie (Moderator) Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the Rapid Podium Presentation, "Participatory Action Research: Enhancing Communication with Stroke Survivors" by Lynn Curley? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the Rapid Podium Presentation, "Creating Systems Change in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Framework for Combining Best Practices, Performance Measures and Implementation Tools to Maximize Quality" by Patrice Lindsay? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the Rapid Podium Presentation, "Communication Access: Research-Based Guidelines for Presenting Accessible Information to Adults Living with Aphasia and Related Communication Disabilities" by Helen Livshits and Ruth Patterson? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Helen Livshits - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Ruth Patterson - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the Rapid Podium Presentation, "The Successful Implementation of a Rehabilitation Notebook for Stroke Patients and Their Families at a Large Inpatient Acute Rehabilitation Hospital" by Rachel Feld-Glazman? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

Question Title

* 11. How would you rate the Rapid Podium Presentation, "Family Informal Stroke Caregiver Self Management (FICSS) Program Preliminary Qualitative Findings" by Gail Mores? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention

T