ML Liaisons March 2012 - Feedback Day 1
Exit this survey
1. Default Section
1
. Using the following scale, rate the relevance of Ken Slentz's update for P-12 Education based upon the level of importance you place on the information he shared.
Using the following scale, rate the relevance of Ken Slentz's update for P-12 Education based upon the level of importance you place on the information he shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was shared was relevant to my position and was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Comment
2
. Using the following scale rate the relevance of Anita Murphy's update from the Office of Curriculum Instruction and Field Services based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Using the following scale rate the relevance of Anita Murphy's update from the Office of Curriculum Instruction and Field Services based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was shared was relevant to my position and was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Comment
3
. Using the following scale rate the relevance of the breakout session on the APPR, Teacher Eval and SLO"S facilitated by Andy Greene and Seth Weitzman, based upon the level of importance you place on the activity and information shared.
Using the following scale rate the relevance of the breakout session on the APPR, Teacher Eval and SLO"S facilitated by Andy Greene and Seth Weitzman, based upon the level of importance you place on the activity and information shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was discussed was relevant to my position and/or was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Other (please specify)
4
. Using the following scale rate the relevance of Allison Armour-Garbs presentation on APPR and Teacher and Principal Standards base upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Using the following scale rate the relevance of Allison Armour-Garbs presentation on APPR and Teacher and Principal Standards base upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was shared was relevant to my position and was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Comment
5
. Using the following scale rate the relevance of the breakout session on the Common Core State Standards facilitated by Shawn Robertson and Seth Weitzman based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Using the following scale rate the relevance of the breakout session on the Common Core State Standards facilitated by Shawn Robertson and Seth Weitzman based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was shared was relevant to my position and was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Comment
6
. Using the following scale rate the relevance of Pamela Tann-Callens presentation on Bullying Prevention and Character Education based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Using the following scale rate the relevance of Pamela Tann-Callens presentation on Bullying Prevention and Character Education based upon the level of importance you place on the information shared.
Very relevant (most or all of what was shared was relevant to my position and was new information.)
Somewhat relevant (Some of the information shared supports my position and the constituents I represent and was new information)
Not relevant (the information does not generally support my professional role or the constituents that I represent)
Comment
7
. Use the space below to offer general comments, questions or suggestions related to day one of the Middle Level Liaison meeting. Feel free to make suggestions for future presentations.
Use the space below to offer general comments, questions or suggestions related to day one of the Middle Level Liaison meeting. Feel free to make suggestions for future presentations.
Powered by
SurveyMonkey
Check out our
sample surveys
and create your own now!
Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.