Design Master Electrical: Lighting Energy Codes

A lot of customers have requested that we support exporting lighting information to COMcheck. It appears that the export is going to be somewhat dependent upon the energy code used in COMcheck. We want to know which energy codes are actually used so we can focus our effort.

All of the codes support by COMcheck are listed, plus California and Washington. Depending upon interest in those two states, we might investigate exporting lighting information to a different program (EnergyPro for CA, not sure for WA). If there are any other states that do not use COMcheck, let us know in the comments.

For this survey, we are interested in what you use for lighting (or other electrical systems). We are not going to try to tackle mechanical systems right now.

Question Title

* 1. How important is it for us to implement support for each of the listed energy codes for lighting?

	Never use	1 - Not important	2	3	4	5 - Very important
90.1 (2001)	90.1 (2001) Never use	90.1 (2001) 1 - Not important	90.1 (2001) 2	90.1 (2001) 3	90.1 (2001) 4	90.1 (2001) 5 - Very important
90.1 (2004)	90.1 (2004) Never use	90.1 (2004) 1 - Not important	90.1 (2004) 2	90.1 (2004) 3	90.1 (2004) 4	90.1 (2004) 5 - Very important
90.1 (2007)	90.1 (2007) Never use	90.1 (2007) 1 - Not important	90.1 (2007) 2	90.1 (2007) 3	90.1 (2007) 4	90.1 (2007) 5 - Very important
90.1 (2010)	90.1 (2010) Never use	90.1 (2010) 1 - Not important	90.1 (2010) 2	90.1 (2010) 3	90.1 (2010) 4	90.1 (2010) 5 - Very important
2003 IECC	2003 IECC Never use	2003 IECC 1 - Not important	2003 IECC 2	2003 IECC 3	2003 IECC 4	2003 IECC 5 - Very important
2004 IECC	2004 IECC Never use	2004 IECC 1 - Not important	2004 IECC 2	2004 IECC 3	2004 IECC 4	2004 IECC 5 - Very important
2006 IECC	2006 IECC Never use	2006 IECC 1 - Not important	2006 IECC 2	2006 IECC 3	2006 IECC 4	2006 IECC 5 - Very important
2009 IECC	2009 IECC Never use	2009 IECC 1 - Not important	2009 IECC 2	2009 IECC 3	2009 IECC 4	2009 IECC 5 - Very important
2012 IECC	2012 IECC Never use	2012 IECC 1 - Not important	2012 IECC 2	2012 IECC 3	2012 IECC 4	2012 IECC 5 - Very important
2010 New York	2010 New York Never use	2010 New York 1 - Not important	2010 New York 2	2010 New York 3	2010 New York 4	2010 New York 5 - Very important
2012 North Carolina	2012 North Carolina Never use	2012 North Carolina 1 - Not important	2012 North Carolina 2	2012 North Carolina 3	2012 North Carolina 4	2012 North Carolina 5 - Very important
Ontario	Ontario Never use	Ontario 1 - Not important	Ontario 2	Ontario 3	Ontario 4	Ontario 5 - Very important
2010 Oregon	2010 Oregon Never use	2010 Oregon 1 - Not important	2010 Oregon 2	2010 Oregon 3	2010 Oregon 4	2010 Oregon 5 - Very important
2011 Puerto Rico	2011 Puerto Rico Never use	2011 Puerto Rico 1 - Not important	2011 Puerto Rico 2	2011 Puerto Rico 3	2011 Puerto Rico 4	2011 Puerto Rico 5 - Very important
2005 Vermont	2005 Vermont Never use	2005 Vermont 1 - Not important	2005 Vermont 2	2005 Vermont 3	2005 Vermont 4	2005 Vermont 5 - Very important
Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft Never use	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft 1 - Not important	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft 2	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft 3	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft 4	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations < 4000 ft 5 - Very important
Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft Never use	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft 1 - Not important	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft 2	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft 3	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft 4	Pima County, Arizona, 2006 IECC for locations >= 4000 ft 5 - Very important
Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard Never use	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard 1 - Not important	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard 2	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard 3	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard 4	Pima County, Arizona, Sustainable Energy Standard 5 - Very important
Title 24 (California)	Title 24 (California) Never use	Title 24 (California) 1 - Not important	Title 24 (California) 2	Title 24 (California) 3	Title 24 (California) 4	Title 24 (California) 5 - Very important
Washington State Energy Code	Washington State Energy Code Never use	Washington State Energy Code 1 - Not important	Washington State Energy Code 2	Washington State Energy Code 3	Washington State Energy Code 4	Washington State Energy Code 5 - Very important

Question Title

* 2. Are there other energy codes you use that are not listed?

Question Title

* 3. Any other comments?

Question Title

* 4. Contact Information. This is not required. Include it if you are willing to be contacted as we develop this export feature.

Name:

Email Address: