Exit this survey Festival of Ideas Review 1. Scoring Directions Question Title * 1. Enter the Number at the top of the page FOI Number Question Title * 2. Alignment with specific practices from the self-study domains.(Curriculum, Assessment, Instruction, Supportive Learning Environment, Professional Development, Leadership) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Domain alignment Domain alignment 1 = Poor Domain alignment 2 = Fair Domain alignment 3 = Good Domain alignment 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 3. Clarity of description of emerging best practices.(Rich description of the practice including key elements and a discussion of how the practice evolved) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Clarity of description Clarity of description 1 = Poor Clarity of description 2 = Fair Clarity of description 3 = Good Clarity of description 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 4. Strength of evidence of impact.(Demonstration of impact on school, staff, and/or students) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Strength of evidence Strength of evidence 1 = Poor Strength of evidence 2 = Fair Strength of evidence 3 = Good Strength of evidence 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 5. Substantive description of key leadership supports.(Detailing of specific leadership actions that supported the implementation of the emerging best practice) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Key leadership supports Key leadership supports 1 = Poor Key leadership supports 2 = Fair Key leadership supports 3 = Good Key leadership supports 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 6. Coherent summary of key lessons learned.(Reflection that highlights key lessons learned) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Key lessons learned Key lessons learned 1 = Poor Key lessons learned 2 = Fair Key lessons learned 3 = Good Key lessons learned 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 7. Overall potential for further development(Foundation of ideas that could be expanded and developed) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Potential for further development Potential for further development 1 = Poor Potential for further development 2 = Fair Potential for further development 3 = Good Potential for further development 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 8. Potential contribution to the field as an Alaskan Rural Practice(Transportability of the idea to other rural Alaskan contexts) 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Outstanding Potential contribution to the field as best practice Potential contribution to the field as best practice 1 = Poor Potential contribution to the field as best practice 2 = Fair Potential contribution to the field as best practice 3 = Good Potential contribution to the field as best practice 4 = Outstanding Question Title * 9. Comments Done