ESGCT and BSGT Evaluation - Brighton 2011
 

1.

 

*
Main congress scientific programme.

(1=poor, 2=unsatisfactory, 3=satisfactory, 4=good, 5=excellent)

 12345
Topics covered
Invited speaker presentations
Proffered paper oral presentations
Session discussions
Poster presentations
Poster locations
Poster session format and duration

Education Day

(1=poor, 2=unsatisfactory, 3=satisfactory, 4=good, 5=excellent)

 12345
Overall quality of Education Day
Topics covered
Quality of discussion
Duration

Public Engagement Day

(1=poor, 2=unsatisfactory, 3=satisfactory, 4=good, 5=excellent)

 12345
Overall quality of the Public Engagement Day
Topics covered
Duration
Discussion

EMA-CAT Workshop

(1=poor, 2=unsatisfactory, 3=satisfactory, 4=good, 5=excellent)

 12345
Overall quality of the EMA-CAT Workshop
Topics covered
Duration
Discussion

The Congress

 12345
How well did the Congress meet your expectations?
Did you have enough information leading up to the congress?
Did you have enough time for discussion with other participants?
Did you get opportunities for new collaboration?

The duration of the congress was:

Organisation and venue

 12345
On-site organisation
Venue
Catering
Congress dinner
Social activities

Website

 12345
Overall usability and quality of the website
Information about the congress
Registration
Abstract submission

What aspects of the congress did you enjoy the most and find the most valuable?

What aspects of the congress did you enjoy the least and what would you like to see improved in future?

Would you describe yourself as:

Are you a member of:

 YesNo
ESGCT
BSGT
ASGCT
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Create your own free online survey now!