Exit this survey
2010 EE Conference Evaluation
1. General
1
. Name
Name
*
2
. Occupation
Occupation
*
3
. Type of Organization
Type of Organization
Government
Non-profit
Private
School
Other (please specify)
*
4
. ZIP Code
ZIP Code
5
. Percentage of conference costs paid by
100%
75 - 99
50 - 74
25 - 49
1 - 24
0
you personally:
*
Percentage of conference costs paid by you personally: 100%
you personally: 75 - 99
you personally: 50 - 74
you personally: 25 - 49
you personally: 1 - 24
you personally: 0
your employer:
your employer: 100%
your employer: 75 - 99
your employer: 50 - 74
your employer: 25 - 49
your employer: 1 - 24
your employer: 0
a sponsor (EE team):
a sponsor (EE team): 100%
a sponsor (EE team): 75 - 99
a sponsor (EE team): 50 - 74
a sponsor (EE team): 25 - 49
a sponsor (EE team): 1 - 24
a sponsor (EE team): 0
6
. How did the cost factor into your participation?
How did the cost factor into your participation?
It was my primary consideration
It was one of several things I considered
I was likely to attend as long as fees were reasonable
7
. What other factor(s) influenced your decision? Location, program agenda, networking opportunity, professional development, etc.
Extremely important
Important
Neutral
Not very important
Location
*
What other factor(s) influenced your decision? Location, program agenda, networking opportunity, professional development, etc. Location Extremely important
Location Important
Location Neutral
Location Not very important
Program agenda
Program agenda Extremely important
Program agenda Important
Program agenda Neutral
Program agenda Not very important
Networking opportunity
Networking opportunity Extremely important
Networking opportunity Important
Networking opportunity Neutral
Networking opportunity Not very important
Professional development
Professional development Extremely important
Professional development Important
Professional development Neutral
Professional development Not very important
Outreach oppportunity
Outreach oppportunity Extremely important
Outreach oppportunity Important
Outreach oppportunity Neutral
Outreach oppportunity Not very important
Cost
Cost Extremely important
Cost Important
Cost Neutral
Cost Not very important
8
. Was the conference setting and/or facility a factor in your decision to attend?
Was the conference setting and/or facility a factor in your decision to attend?
Yes
No
9
. Suggestions to improve future conferences:
Suggestions to improve future conferences:
10
. What did you find most useful about this conference?
What did you find most useful about this conference?
Opportunity to meet other professionals
New Content materials
Specific topics of interests
Opportunity to see new facility
Convenience
Cost
Other (please specify)
11
. Suggestions for future locations (that can accommodate 150 people with space for breakout sessions):
Suggestions for future locations (that can accommodate 150 people with space for breakout sessions):
12
. Suggestions for future conference topics:
Suggestions for future conference topics:
13
. What would you recommend to conference planners for next year?
What would you recommend to conference planners for next year?
14
. The selection of sessions this year was a balance of indoor presentations (PowerPoint, etc.) and outdoor presentations (hands-on, etc.). Do you think this was:
The selection of sessions this year was a balance of indoor presentations (PowerPoint, etc.) and outdoor presentations (hands-on, etc.). Do you think this was:
Just right
Need more PowerPoint sessions
Need more outdoor hands-on sessions
Other (please specify)
15
. How did you you learn about the conference?
How did you you learn about the conference?
Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.