J R Army Med Corps
Exit this survey

1.

1. The appearances of the Journal have changed significantly over the last few years. Please say how much you believe the following aspects of the Journal at present contribute to a professional and readable appearance.

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Undecided	Agree	Strongly Agree
Fonts and typesetting style	*The appearances of the Journal have changed significantly over the last few years. Please say how much you believe the following aspects of the Journal at present contribute to a professional and readable appearance. Fonts and typesetting style Strongly Disagree	Fonts and typesetting style Disagree	Fonts and typesetting style Undecided	Fonts and typesetting style Agree	Fonts and typesetting style Strongly Agree
Two column layout	Two column layout Strongly Disagree	Two column layout Disagree	Two column layout Undecided	Two column layout Agree	Two column layout Strongly Agree
Colour highlighting	Colour highlighting Strongly Disagree	Colour highlighting Disagree	Colour highlighting Undecided	Colour highlighting Agree	Colour highlighting Strongly Agree
Cover illustrations	Cover illustrations Strongly Disagree	Cover illustrations Disagree	Cover illustrations Undecided	Cover illustrations Agree	Cover illustrations Strongly Agree

Other Comments regarding the appearance of the Journal

2. The Journal publishes many different sorts of article. Please indicate whether you would wish the Journal to continue publishing the following sorts of articles.

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Undecided	Agree	Strongly Agree
Editorials	*The Journal publishes many different sorts of article. Please indicate whether you would wish the Journal to continue publishing the following sorts of articles. Editorials Strongly Disagree	Editorials Disagree	Editorials Undecided	Editorials Agree	Editorials Strongly Agree
Personal Views (on contentious issues)	Personal Views (on contentious issues) Strongly Disagree	Personal Views (on contentious issues) Disagree	Personal Views (on contentious issues) Undecided	Personal Views (on contentious issues) Agree	Personal Views (on contentious issues) Strongly Agree
Reviews on topics of interest	Reviews on topics of interest Strongly Disagree	Reviews on topics of interest Disagree	Reviews on topics of interest Undecided	Reviews on topics of interest Agree	Reviews on topics of interest Strongly Agree
Original Articles	Original Articles Strongly Disagree	Original Articles Disagree	Original Articles Undecided	Original Articles Agree	Original Articles Strongly Agree
Case Reports	Case Reports Strongly Disagree	Case Reports Disagree	Case Reports Undecided	Case Reports Agree	Case Reports Strongly Agree
Self Assessment Questions	Self Assessment Questions Strongly Disagree	Self Assessment Questions Disagree	Self Assessment Questions Undecided	Self Assessment Questions Agree	Self Assessment Questions Strongly Agree
Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings	Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings Strongly Disagree	Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings Disagree	Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings Undecided	Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings Agree	Abstracts & Reports of military medical meetings Strongly Agree
Book Reviews	Book Reviews Strongly Disagree	Book Reviews Disagree	Book Reviews Undecided	Book Reviews Agree	Book Reviews Strongly Agree
Letters to the Editor	Letters to the Editor Strongly Disagree	Letters to the Editor Disagree	Letters to the Editor Undecided	Letters to the Editor Agree	Letters to the Editor Strongly Agree
Articles about medical VCs	Articles about medical VCs Strongly Disagree	Articles about medical VCs Disagree	Articles about medical VCs Undecided	Articles about medical VCs Agree	Articles about medical VCs Strongly Agree
Historical articles	Historical articles Strongly Disagree	Historical articles Disagree	Historical articles Undecided	Historical articles Agree	Historical articles Strongly Agree
Historical articles with modern commentaries	Historical articles with modern commentaries Strongly Disagree	Historical articles with modern commentaries Disagree	Historical articles with modern commentaries Undecided	Historical articles with modern commentaries Agree	Historical articles with modern commentaries Strongly Agree

3. With specific reference to Self Assessment Questions (SAQs), please indicate your views.

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Undecided	Agree	Strongly Agree
SAQs should be scrapped altogether	*With specific reference to Self Assessment Questions (SAQs), please indicate your views. SAQs should be scrapped altogether Strongly Disagree	SAQs should be scrapped altogether Disagree	SAQs should be scrapped altogether Undecided	SAQs should be scrapped altogether Agree	SAQs should be scrapped altogether Strongly Agree
SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only'	SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only' Strongly Disagree	SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only' Disagree	SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only' Undecided	SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only' Agree	SAQs should continue in their present format but 'on-line only' Strongly Agree
SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD)	SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD) Strongly Disagree	SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD) Disagree	SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD) Undecided	SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD) Agree	SAQs should be linked to the content of that edition of the journal (as CPD) Strongly Agree
Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful	Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful Strongly Disagree	Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful Disagree	Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful Undecided	Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful Agree	Online SAQs with certificate of completion (for CPD) would be useful Strongly Agree
SAQs must be of military relevance	SAQs must be of military relevance Strongly Disagree	SAQs must be of military relevance Disagree	SAQs must be of military relevance Undecided	SAQs must be of military relevance Agree	SAQs must be of military relevance Strongly Agree

Other comments about Self Assessment Questions

4. The Journal's website is about to undergo renovation and offers an opportunity to increase the scope of its content. Please tell us your views on the following ideas for the website.

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Undecided	Agree	Strongly Agree
Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only	*The Journal's website is about to undergo renovation and offers an opportunity to increase the scope of its content. Please tell us your views on the following ideas for the website. Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only Strongly Disagree	Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only Disagree	Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only Undecided	Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only Agree	Publishing abbreviated articles on paper with full articles 'on-line' only Strongly Agree
Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966	Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966 Strongly Disagree	Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966 Disagree	Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966 Undecided	Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966 Agree	Hosting Journal back-editions to 1966 Strongly Agree

Other comments about the Journal website

5. Articles of military interest and publications by military authors may not be brought to the attention of a wide enough audience. Should the Journal . . . ?

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Undecided	Agree	Strongly Disagree
Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals	*Articles of military interest and publications by military authors may not be brought to the attention of a wide enough audience. Should the Journal . . . ? Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals Strongly Disagree	Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals Disagree	Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals Undecided	Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals Agree	Publish abstracts of military authors' work published in other journals Strongly Disagree
Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals	Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals Strongly Disagree	Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals Disagree	Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals Undecided	Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals Agree	Publish abstracts of a selection of recent articles of probable military interest from other journals Strongly Disagree

Other comments on abstracts

6. If you have published research of potential military interest in a journal other than the J R Army Med Corps, what factors influenced your decision to submit it elsewhere?

If you have published research of potential military interest in a journal other than the J R Army Med Corps, what factors influenced your decision to submit it elsewhere?

7. Please tell us about anything else that you feel is important about the Journal. Use this opportunity to tell us about anything you think the Journal should start doing (or including), stop doing (or exclude) or should continue to do

Please tell us about anything else that you feel is important about the Journal. Use this opportunity to tell us about anything you think the Journal should start doing (or including), stop doing (or exclude) or should continue to do

8. Are you . . . ?

Are you . . . ? currently serving

retired from the military

a non-military subscriber

If serving - for how long?

9. Are you . . . ?

Are you . . . ? GDMO / GP trainee

Qualified GP

Hospital Doctor - trainee

Hospital Doctor - consultant

Nurse

Professional Allied to Medicine

Medical Support Officer

Other (please specify)

form {display:none;} #jserror {text-align:center;margin-top:50px;}Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.

J R Army Med CorpsExit this survey

1.