Participant Survey: 2010 Commission on International Programs Meeting

1. 2010 Review

	Poor	Fair	Average	Good	Very Good	N/A
Overall Quality	*On a scale of 1 to 5 please rate the following aspects of 2010 CIP Summer Meeting. Overall Quality Poor	Overall Quality Fair	Overall Quality Average	Overall Quality Good	Overall Quality Very Good	Overall Quality N/A
Length of Meeting	Length of Meeting Poor	Length of Meeting Fair	Length of Meeting Average	Length of Meeting Good	Length of Meeting Very Good	Length of Meeting N/A
Location	Location Poor	Location Fair	Location Average	Location Good	Location Very Good	Location N/A
Networking Opportunities	Networking Opportunities Poor	Networking Opportunities Fair	Networking Opportunities Average	Networking Opportunities Good	Networking Opportunities Very Good	Networking Opportunities N/A
Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution Poor	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution Fair	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution Average	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution Good	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution Very Good	Relevance of Sessions to You and Your Institution N/A
Speaker Quality	Speaker Quality Poor	Speaker Quality Fair	Speaker Quality Average	Speaker Quality Good	Speaker Quality Very Good	Speaker Quality N/A
Meeting Materials and Handouts	Meeting Materials and Handouts Poor	Meeting Materials and Handouts Fair	Meeting Materials and Handouts Average	Meeting Materials and Handouts Good	Meeting Materials and Handouts Very Good	Meeting Materials and Handouts N/A

Additional Comments

Which sessions at the 2010 CIP Summer Meeting were particularly useful to you and why?

Which sessions at the 2010 CIP Summer Meeting were not especially useful and why?

form {display:none;} #jserror {text-align:center;margin-top:50px;}Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.