Survey on the Working Group on Education and Fragility
Exit this survey
 

1. Default Section

 
This survey aims at collecting your views on the INEE Working Group on Education and Fragility and is being conducted in the context of a currently on-going external review of this Working Group. Completing the survey should take you no more than 10 minutes. Your input is highly appreciated and will be important in shaping the recommendations from this review.

1. How long have you been a member of INEE?

2. Are you currently, or have you been in the past, a member of the INEE Working Group on Education and Fragility?

3. What is the main focus of your work?

4. How familiar are you with the work of the WG on Education and Fragility?

5. In your opinion, to what extent has the Working Group on Education and Fragility made a contribution to the following specific areas:

 Contributed significantlyContributed somewhatNegligilbe contributionDon't know/ no opinion
Strengthening consensus around education and fragility
Enhancing the evidence base in general
Enhancing understanding of effective education interventions in fragile setings
Promoting alternative mechanisms to support education in fragile contexts
Community building among members
Networking with others working in the field
Developing tools/guidelines for the field
Policy development around education and fragility
Don’t know/no opinion

6. INEE’s strategic goals are to enhance institutional coordination around education for all affected by crisis, enhance global knowledge and capacity in this field, and to promote a dynamic membership to advance the field of education in emergencies. How important, in your opinion, has the Working Group on Education and Fragility been in contributing to these goals of INEE?

7. The Working Group's term has recently been extended for a further year to May 2011. From your perspective what key activities should the WG focus on between now and then?

8. Do you think the WG should continue to function beyond May 2011?

9. If your answer to the previous question was "yes", then what in your opinion should be the continued focus of the Working Group beyond May 2011?

10. If your answer to question 8 was "no", then please indicate why you think the Working Group should not continue beyond May 2011.