AIAMC 2012 Annual Meeting Evaluation

1. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM
Topics were relevant to my practice.

2. Stated objectives were clearly presented.

3. Educational design and format was helpful.

4. Presentation level was appropriate.

5. Teaching methods were effective.

6. Syllabus materials were useful.

7. My educational needs were satisfied.

8. My practice outcomes will be improved.

9. Was this program, and all lectures in it, free of commercial bias?

10. This was a valuable use of my time:

11. The most beneficial part of this CME conference was:

12. OBJECTIVES
Objective 1: Articulate the value of creating a shared vision for transforming healthcare.

13. Objective 2: Recognize the roles of UGME, GME, CME and research in the transformation of healthcare, both nationally and institutionally.

14. Objective 3: Define barriers and their countermeasures in developing a shared institutional and program vision.

15. Objective 4: Facilitate the development of faculty and improvement in the teaching of medicine.

16. Objective 5: Assess their individual and institutional capabilities for innovation, discovery, and scholarship.

17. QUALITY
Announcements for the conference were timely.

18. Date and time of the week was convenient.

19. Geographic location of the meeting was a plus.

20. Meeting room was conducive for learning.

21. Conference registration process was easy.

22. Conference was the right length.

23. I would recommend this conference to others.

24. FACULTY
Overall, the speakers were knowledgeable regarding the content presented.

25. Describe any presentations that were exceptional:

26. Describe any presentations that did not meet your needs or expectations:

27. FACILITIES & MEALS
Quality of my guest/sleep room

28. Service provided by the hotel staff

29. Quality of opening reception (Thursday)

30. Quality of breakfasts

31. Quality of lunches

32. Quality of off-site awards dinner (Friday)

33. EXHIBITS
Amount of time allotted to visit exhibits

34. Courtesy of the exhibitors

35. Applicability of companies’ services to my position/my hospital’s vendor needs

36. Please mark the category that best describes you:

37. Number of Years in Practice:

38. How did you learn about this CME conference?

39. What were your reasons for choosing this CME conference?

40. OVERALL
The primary way to improve future CME conferences is:

41. My general comments about this CME conference are:

42. My suggestions for future topics and/or presenters include:

43. Our 2013 meeting will be held March 21-23 in Naples, Florida. What locations would be most appealing to you for the 2014 meeting?:

44. If you would consider serving on the 2013 planning committee, please submit the following information: