CME CONFERENCE EVALUATION
2012 AIAMC Annual Meeting
March 29-31, 2012
Tucson, AZ

Question Title

* 1. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM
Topics were relevant to my practice.

Question Title

* 2. Stated objectives were clearly presented.

Question Title

* 3. Educational design and format was helpful.

Question Title

* 4. Presentation level was appropriate.

Question Title

* 5. Teaching methods were effective.

Question Title

* 6. Syllabus materials were useful.

Question Title

* 7. My educational needs were satisfied.

Question Title

* 8. My practice outcomes will be improved.

Question Title

* 9. Was this program, and all lectures in it, free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 10. This was a valuable use of my time:

Question Title

* 11. The most beneficial part of this CME conference was:

Question Title

* 12. OBJECTIVES
Objective 1: Articulate the value of creating a shared vision for transforming healthcare.

Question Title

* 13. Objective 2: Recognize the roles of UGME, GME, CME and research in the transformation of healthcare, both nationally and institutionally.

Question Title

* 14. Objective 3: Define barriers and their countermeasures in developing a shared institutional and program vision.

Question Title

* 15. Objective 4: Facilitate the development of faculty and improvement in the teaching of medicine.

Question Title

* 16. Objective 5: Assess their individual and institutional capabilities for innovation, discovery, and scholarship.

Question Title

* 17. QUALITY
Announcements for the conference were timely.

Question Title

* 18. Date and time of the week was convenient.

Question Title

* 19. Geographic location of the meeting was a plus.

Question Title

* 20. Meeting room was conducive for learning.

Question Title

* 21. Conference registration process was easy.

Question Title

* 22. Conference was the right length.

Question Title

* 23. I would recommend this conference to others.

Question Title

* 24. FACULTY
Overall, the speakers were knowledgeable regarding the content presented.

Question Title

* 25. Describe any presentations that were exceptional:

Question Title

* 26. Describe any presentations that did not meet your needs or expectations:

Question Title

* 27. FACILITIES & MEALS
Quality of my guest/sleep room

Question Title

* 28. Service provided by the hotel staff

Question Title

* 29. Quality of opening reception (Thursday)

Question Title

* 30. Quality of breakfasts

Question Title

* 31. Quality of lunches

Question Title

* 32. Quality of off-site awards dinner (Friday)

Question Title

* 33. EXHIBITS
Amount of time allotted to visit exhibits

Question Title

* 34. Courtesy of the exhibitors

Question Title

* 35. Applicability of companies’ services to my position/my hospital’s vendor needs

Question Title

* 36. Please mark the category that best describes you:

Question Title

* 37. Number of Years in Practice:

Question Title

* 38. How did you learn about this CME conference?

Question Title

* 39. What were your reasons for choosing this CME conference?

Question Title

* 40. OVERALL
The primary way to improve future CME conferences is:

Question Title

* 41. My general comments about this CME conference are:

Question Title

* 42. My suggestions for future topics and/or presenters include:

Question Title

* 43. Our 2013 meeting will be held March 21-23 in Naples, Florida. What locations would be most appealing to you for the 2014 meeting?:

Question Title

* 44. If you would consider serving on the 2013 planning committee, please submit the following information:

THANK YOU for your valuable feedback!

T