Chatfield Summit Feedback Survey

Thanks for participating in the Chatfield Watershed Authority "Chatfield Summit" on June 16, 2010. We appreciate your feedback on the following 7 questions.

1. The following questions concern the morning presentations and panel discussion (Julie Vlier, Tetra Tech; Jeff Shoemaker, The Greenway Foundation; Tom Browning, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Larry Vickerman, Denver Botanic Gardens at Chatfield; Deric Clemens, Natural Resources Conservation Service; Don Kennedy, Denver Water).

	Agree	Indifferent	Disagree
The panel was an effective means to structure the discussion.	*The following questions concern the morning presentations and panel discussion (Julie Vlier, Tetra Tech; Jeff Shoemaker, The Greenway Foundation; Tom Browning, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Larry Vickerman, Denver Botanic Gardens at Chatfield; Deric Clemens, Natural Resources Conservation Service; Don Kennedy, Denver Water). The panel was an effective means to structure the discussion. Agree	The panel was an effective means to structure the discussion. Indifferent	The panel was an effective means to structure the discussion. Disagree
The panelists were knowledgeable and qualified.	The panelists were knowledgeable and qualified. Agree	The panelists were knowledgeable and qualified. Indifferent	The panelists were knowledgeable and qualified. Disagree
The panelists stayed on topic.	The panelists stayed on topic. Agree	The panelists stayed on topic. Indifferent	The panelists stayed on topic. Disagree
The topics discussed by the panel were relevant and interesting.	The topics discussed by the panel were relevant and interesting. Agree	The topics discussed by the panel were relevant and interesting. Indifferent	The topics discussed by the panel were relevant and interesting. Disagree

2. Please share your opinion of the keynote speaker Barbara Biggs (Government Affairs Officer for the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District).

	Agree	Indifferent	Disagree
The keynote speaker was engaging.	*Please share your opinion of the keynote speaker Barbara Biggs (Government Affairs Officer for the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District). The keynote speaker was engaging. Agree	The keynote speaker was engaging. Indifferent	The keynote speaker was engaging. Disagree
The keynote speaker was well spoken and knowledgeable.	The keynote speaker was well spoken and knowledgeable. Agree	The keynote speaker was well spoken and knowledgeable. Indifferent	The keynote speaker was well spoken and knowledgeable. Disagree
The keynote address was relevant and interesting.	The keynote address was relevant and interesting. Agree	The keynote address was relevant and interesting. Indifferent	The keynote address was relevant and interesting. Disagree

3. Please give us your feedback with regards to the afternoon breakout sessions.

	Agree	Indifferent	Disagree
The breakout sessions were an effective means to spark discussions.	*Please give us your feedback with regards to the afternoon breakout sessions. The breakout sessions were an effective means to spark discussions. Agree	The breakout sessions were an effective means to spark discussions. Indifferent	The breakout sessions were an effective means to spark discussions. Disagree
The breakout sessions were a productive way to generate ideas and next steps to water related issues.	The breakout sessions were a productive way to generate ideas and next steps to water related issues. Agree	The breakout sessions were a productive way to generate ideas and next steps to water related issues. Indifferent	The breakout sessions were a productive way to generate ideas and next steps to water related issues. Disagree
The topics chosen for the breakout sessions were important and appropriate.	The topics chosen for the breakout sessions were important and appropriate. Agree	The topics chosen for the breakout sessions were important and appropriate. Indifferent	The topics chosen for the breakout sessions were important and appropriate. Disagree
The Division of Wildlife boat tour at the Chatfield Resevoir was relevant and educational.	The Division of Wildlife boat tour at the Chatfield Resevoir was relevant and educational. Agree	The Division of Wildlife boat tour at the Chatfield Resevoir was relevant and educational. Indifferent	The Division of Wildlife boat tour at the Chatfield Resevoir was relevant and educational. Disagree

4. Please give your opinion regarding the duration of each part of the Chatfiel Summit.

	too long	just right	too short
The panel discussion was	*Please give your opinion regarding the duration of each part of the Chatfiel Summit. The panel discussion was too long	The panel discussion was just right	The panel discussion was too short
The keynote address was	The keynote address was too long	The keynote address was just right	The keynote address was too short
The breakout group session was	The breakout group session was too long	The breakout group session was just right	The breakout group session was too short
The overall Chatfield Summit was	The overall Chatfield Summit was too long	The overall Chatfield Summit was just right	The overall Chatfield Summit was too short

5. Please rate your experience of the following aspects of the Chatfield Summit.

	Excellent	Satisfactory	Bad
How did you find the venue chosen for the Chatfield Summit?	*Please rate your experience of the following aspects of the Chatfield Summit. How did you find the venue chosen for the Chatfield Summit? Excellent	How did you find the venue chosen for the Chatfield Summit? Satisfactory	How did you find the venue chosen for the Chatfield Summit? Bad
How did you find the food provided at the Chatfield Summit?	How did you find the food provided at the Chatfield Summit? Excellent	How did you find the food provided at the Chatfield Summit? Satisfactory	How did you find the food provided at the Chatfield Summit? Bad
How were the audio and visual aspects of the Chatfield Summit?	How were the audio and visual aspects of the Chatfield Summit? Excellent	How were the audio and visual aspects of the Chatfield Summit? Satisfactory	How were the audio and visual aspects of the Chatfield Summit? Bad
How was the overall organization of the Chatfield Summit?	How was the overall organization of the Chatfield Summit? Excellent	How was the overall organization of the Chatfield Summit? Satisfactory	How was the overall organization of the Chatfield Summit? Bad

6. The Chatfield Summit may be an event the Chatfield Watershed Authority hosts in alternate years. With that in mind, please answer the following questions.

	Yes	No	Maybe
Would you attend the Chatfield Summit again in the future?	*The Chatfield Summit may be an event the Chatfield Watershed Authority hosts in alternate years. With that in mind, please answer the following questions. Would you attend the Chatfield Summit again in the future? Yes	Would you attend the Chatfield Summit again in the future? No	Would you attend the Chatfield Summit again in the future? Maybe
Would you recommend to others to attend future summit events?	Would you recommend to others to attend future summit events? Yes	Would you recommend to others to attend future summit events? No	Would you recommend to others to attend future summit events? Maybe

7. Please share with us any comments or suggestions you have with respect to any aspect of the Chatfield Summit.

Please share with us any comments or suggestions you have with respect to any aspect of the Chatfield Summit.

Chatfield Summit FeedbackExit this survey