Safeguarding Homeless Families first evaluation

Safeguarding Homeless Families - Evaluation form - primary evaluation

Please take a few minutes to tell us what you thought about the Safeguarding Homeless Families guidance.
This will help us to report to the project funders and also to make improvements to the document.
All information is confidential. Please feel free to give negative comments as well as the positive ones.

Question Title

* 1. Can you give your name please?

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the different parts of the guidance document?

	Excellent	Very good	Good	Poor	Very poor
Main paper	Main paper Excellent	Main paper Very good	Main paper Good	Main paper Poor	Main paper Very poor
What good practice looks like	What good practice looks like Excellent	What good practice looks like Very good	What good practice looks like Good	What good practice looks like Poor	What good practice looks like Very poor
Recommended reading	Recommended reading Excellent	Recommended reading Very good	Recommended reading Good	Recommended reading Poor	Recommended reading Very poor
Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children)	Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children) Excellent	Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children) Very good	Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children) Good	Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children) Poor	Appendix 1 (vaulnerability of children) Very poor
Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults)	Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults) Excellent	Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults) Very good	Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults) Good	Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults) Poor	Appendix 2 (vaulnerability of adults) Very poor
Appendix 3 (worked example)	Appendix 3 (worked example) Excellent	Appendix 3 (worked example) Very good	Appendix 3 (worked example) Good	Appendix 3 (worked example) Poor	Appendix 3 (worked example) Very poor

Question Title

* 3. What has been the most useful part of the document and why?

Question Title

* 4. How has this helped you in your job?

Question Title

* 5. Have you used this tool, or do you intend to use it to influence commissioners/service provision?
If so, can you give some details?

Question Title

* 6. Do you have any other comments (positve or negative)?

Question Title

* 7. What about the length of the document? Do you think it was about right, too long or too short?

Question Title

* 8. Can you suggest any improvements or additions?

Question Title

* 9. Which other topics would you like guidance/toolkit to be written on?

Nutrition

Discharge Planning

Mental Health Issues

Dealing with clinical conditions

Any others (please specify)

Question Title

* 1. Can you give your name please?

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the different parts of the guidance document?

Question Title

* 3. What has been the most useful part of the document and why?

Question Title

* 4. How has this helped you in your job?

Question Title

* 5. Have you used this tool, or do you intend to use it to influence commissioners/service provision?If so, can you give some details?

Question Title

* 6. Do you have any other comments (positve or negative)?

Question Title

* 7. What about the length of the document? Do you think it was about right, too long or too short?

Question Title

* 8. Can you suggest any improvements or additions?

Question Title

* 9. Which other topics would you like guidance/toolkit to be written on?

* 5. Have you used this tool, or do you intend to use it to influence commissioners/service provision?
If so, can you give some details?