3424481 Attestation - Controversial Cases in Hematologic Malignancies and Hematology 2014

1. Friday, April 11th, 2014 - Sessions

Page1 / 4

YOU CAN ACCESS THE EVALUATION TOOL ON A DAILY BASIS. THE PROGRAM TRACKS THE RESPONSES BY COMPUTER SO ATTENDEES MUST LOG IN USING THE SAME COMPUTER ON A DAILY BASIS AND YOU CANNOT SHARE COMPUTERS.

IN ORDER TO SAVE THE ANSWERS YOU MUST CLICK ‘NEXT’ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. YOU CAN ALSO GO BACK TO PREVIOUS DAYS IF YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANSWERS.

Please Note: When reentering survey, i-pads, phones and tablets may not show previous day's submissions. Please continue from where you left off. Results have been recorded even though they may not be displayed.

*Please evaluate only the sessions you participated in.

Question Title

* 1. Welcoming Remarks
Program Directors

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 2. Diagnosing and Treating Thrombocytopenia in the CA Patient
David J Kuter, MD, PhD

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 3. Transfusion Medicine for the Hematologist/Oncologist
Sunny Dzik, MD

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 4. Thrombosis Management Cases
Jean Marie Connors, MD

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 5. Challenging Consults
Annemarie E. Fogerty, MD

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 6. Discussion
Dr. Fogerty with Drs. Dzik and Connors

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 7. Health Care Management in the Era of Payment Reform
Paul E Mendis, MD

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation

Question Title

* 8. ABIM MOC Learning Session: Hematology
Drs. Ballen, Fogerty and Hochberg

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of presentation	Quality of presentation Poor	Quality of presentation Fair	Quality of presentation Good	Quality of presentation Very Good	Quality of presentation Excellent
Relevance to practice	Relevance to practice Poor	Relevance to practice Fair	Relevance to practice Good	Relevance to practice Very Good	Relevance to practice Excellent

Additional comments about this speaker or presentation