332545 - Clinical Nuclear Medicine

1.Tuesday, May 7, 2013 - Sessions

Thank you for participating in our continuing education activity. Completing this evaluation will provide feedback to the course directors and faculty and helps us to meet ACCME (The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education) requirements. We appreciate your feedback. Your suggestions will help the Harvard Medical School Department of Continuing Medical Education improve future educational activities.

YOU CAN ACCESS THE EVALUATION TOOL ON A DAILY BASIS. THE PROGRAM TRACKS THE RESPONSES BY COMPUTER SO ATTENDEES MUST LOG IN USING THE SAME COMPUTER ON A DAILY BASIS AND YOU CANNOT SHARE COMPUTERS.

IN ORDER TO SAVE THE ANSWERS YOU MUST CLICK ‘NEXT’ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. YOU CAN ALSO GO BACK TO PREVIOUS DAYS IF YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANSWERS.

Completing the evaluation is necessary to receive your CME certificate.

Please evaluate only the lectures attended.

1 / 6
1.PET/CT: Cancer Imaging Techniques and Radiation Dose Reduction: What Should You Know?
Jeffrey Yap, PhD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
2.PET/CT: Practical Clinical Aspects: What Should You Know?
Heather Jacene, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
3.PET/MRI: Basic Principles, Technology, and Practical Aspects: What Should You Know?
Georges El Fakhri, PhD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
4.PET/MRI: Cancer Imaging Applications
Georges El Fakhri, PhD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
5.Lymphoma: The Oncologist Point of View
David Fisher, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
6.Lymphoma: The Nuclear Medicine Point of View
Heather Jacene, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
7.Lymphoma and Beyond: The Therapeutic Point of View
Heather Jacene, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
8.Lung Cancer
Eric Rohren, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
9.Gastrointestinal Cancers
Chun Kim, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
10.Neuroendocrine Tumors
Christopher Sakellis, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
11.Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer
Annick Van den Abbeele, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice
12.Emerging Tracers and Therapies
Wolfgang Weber, MD
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Quality of presentation
Relevance to practice