332445 - Psychiatry in 2013 Survey

Thank you for participating in our continuing education activity. Completing this evaluation will provide feedback to the course directors and faculty and helps us to meet ACCME requirements. Completing the evaluation is necessary to receive your CME certificate. We appreciate your feedback. Your suggestions will help us improve future educational activities.

YOU CAN ACCESS THE EVALUATION TOOL ON A DAILY BASIS. THE PROGRAM TRACKS THE RESPONSES BY COMPUTER SO ATTENDEES MUST LOG IN USING THE SAME COMPUTER ON A DAILY BASIS AND YOU CANNOT SHARE COMPUTERS.

IN ORDER TO SAVE THE ANSWERS YOU MUST CLICK ‘NEXT’ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. YOU CAN ALSO GO BACK TO PREVIOUS DAYS IF YOU NEED TO CHANGE ANSWERS.

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Quality of Presentation	Quality of Presentation Poor	Quality of Presentation Fair	Quality of Presentation Good	Quality of Presentation Very Good	Quality of Presentation Excellent
Relevance to Practice	Relevance to Practice Poor	Relevance to Practice Fair	Relevance to Practice Good	Relevance to Practice Very Good	Relevance to Practice Excellent
Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good	Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent
Speaker's Teaching Ability	Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor	Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair	Speaker's Teaching Ability Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good	Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent
Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good	Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Quality of Presentation

Quality of Presentation Poor

Quality of Presentation Fair

Quality of Presentation Good

Quality of Presentation Very Good

Quality of Presentation Excellent

Relevance to Practice

Relevance to Practice Poor

Relevance to Practice Fair

Relevance to Practice Good

Relevance to Practice Very Good

Relevance to Practice Excellent

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Poor

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Fair

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Very Good

Speaker's Knowledge/Expertise Excellent

Speaker's Teaching Ability

Speaker's Teaching Ability Poor

Speaker's Teaching Ability Fair

Speaker's Teaching Ability Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Very Good

Speaker's Teaching Ability Excellent

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Poor

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Fair

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Very Good

Elaborated Upon the Stated Objectives Excellent

332445 - Psychiatry in 2013

1. Thursday, June 13 - Sessions

Question Title

* 1. DSM-5
Katharine A. Phillips, MD

Question Title

* 2. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Psychosis
Dost Öngür, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 3. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder
Dost Öngür, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 4. Geriatric Psychiatry
Brent P. Forester, MD

Question Title

* 5. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Thomas J. Weigel, MD

Question Title

* 6. Treatment of Patients with Substance Use Disorders and Psychiatric Illness
Roger D. Weiss, MD

Question Title

* 1. DSM-5Katharine A. Phillips, MD

Question Title

* 2. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of PsychosisDost Öngür, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 3. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar DisorderDost Öngür, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 4. Geriatric PsychiatryBrent P. Forester, MD

Question Title

* 5. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderThomas J. Weigel, MD

Question Title

* 6. Treatment of Patients with Substance Use Disorders and Psychiatric IllnessRoger D. Weiss, MD

* 1. DSM-5
Katharine A. Phillips, MD

* 2. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Psychosis
Dost Öngür, MD, PhD

* 3. Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder
Dost Öngür, MD, PhD

* 4. Geriatric Psychiatry
Brent P. Forester, MD

* 5. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Thomas J. Weigel, MD

* 6. Treatment of Patients with Substance Use Disorders and Psychiatric Illness
Roger D. Weiss, MD