Skip to content
FMC Policy Summit 2010 Evaluation
5.
Programming
1.
Location and Time
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
a. Location and venue were good/convenient
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
b. The first week in October is a convenient time of year.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
c. The event’s length and structure were good.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
d. Can you suggest other cities or venues for future Policy Summits?
2.
Mainstage Programming
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
a. The panels covered relevant topics
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
b. The panels were informative
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
c. The panels were the right length
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
d. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to experience/position/opinions.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
e. There was enough diversity among the panelists related to gender, race, age, cultural background.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Comments
3.
Moderators
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
a. The moderators were informed
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
b. The moderators did a good job balancing questions from the audience with questions for the panelists.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
4.
Keynote Speakers
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
a. The keynote speakers were informed
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
b. The keynote speakers talked about important topics
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Slightly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A