Skip to content

EFR227 Sustainability and the Ordinance: A Mock Historic Preservation Commission Meeting

The learning objectives for this session were:
1. Participants will learn proper language and terms to use when reviewing applications and forming motions.
2. Participants will be able to identify strategies for dealing with applicants who do not “buy in” to the regulatory process of design review.
3. Participants will learn how to identify incomplete components of a Certificate of Appropriateness application.
4. Participants will have a better understanding of conflict of interest and ethical concerns amongst commission members.
1.Did the presenter(s) cover all 4 of the learning objectives?
2.If he/she did not cover all four, which one(s) were left out?
Please rate this session on the following characteristics:
3.I found the information in this session relevant.
4.I was comfortable with the pace of this session .
5.I was comfortable with the length of this session .
6.I was well engaged during the session.
7.It was easy for me to get actively involved during the session.
8.Please briefly describe the activities that were successful in allowing you to become actively involved.
9.The presenter(s) was (were) knowledgeable about the topic.
10.I will be able to apply what I learned in this session to my work.
11.We are interested in knowing if/how you apply what you learned in this session to your work. If you agree to be interviewed 6 months from now, would you please give us your name and email address in the box below?
12.I would recommend the presenter(s) to my peers.
13.The most important thing I learned in this session was...
14.Commendations or suggestions for improvement.
Thank you for taking the time to take this survey; your feedback will help us improve future educational sessions.