Conference Speaker Evaluation

 
 50% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. How would you rate the session, "The Major in the Mild: Emotional, Cognitive and Behavioural Problems after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury " by Dr. Abe Snaiderman? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - NeutralDid you feel there were any commercial interests presentation 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the session, "Contributions of Functional MRI and Event-Related Potentials to Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation" by Dr. Alain Ptito? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - NeutralDid you feel there were any commercial interests presentation 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)
WORKSHOP SESSIONS - (Only evaluate the workshops you attended)

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate Workshop 1, "Sleep and Wake Disturbance after mTBI" by Catherine Wiseman-Hakes? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate Workshop 2, "An Overview of Vestibular Dizziness in the Acquired Brain Injury Population" by Jennifer Toland and Jocelyn Denomme? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Jennifer Toland - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Jocelyn Denomme - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 5. How would you rate Workshop 3, "Litigation/Adjudication of a mTBI Claim" by Roger Oatley, John McLeish, Dale Orlando, and Jim Vigmond? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Roger Oatley -Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
John McLeish - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Dale Orlando - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Jim Vigmond - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate Workshop 4, "Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Value and Limitations" by Dr. Leslie Ruttan? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 7. How would you rate the session, "The Post Concussion Syndrome: Conceptualisation and Treatment" by Dr. Nigel S. King? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 8. How would you rate the session, "Neuroimaging after Head Injury: Advancements and Limitations" by Dr. Tom A. Schweizer? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the session,"Mild Traumatic Brain Injury on Trial - A Mock-Jury Trial in which the Audience is the Jury!" by Roger Oatley, John McLeish, Dale Orlando, Jim Vigmond and Dr. Abe Snaiderman? Please select the applicable number.

  1 - Strongly Disagree 2 - Disagree 3 - Neutral 4 - Agree 5 - Strongly Agree
Information was relevant and useful to my practice
The proportion of time for the presentation and discussion was suitable for the content
Roger Oatley -Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
John McLeish - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Dale Orlando - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Jim Vigmond - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Dr. Abe Snaiderman - Information was clearly presented and presenter kept my attention
Did you feel there were any commercial interests presentation (1 = No, 5 = Yes)

T