2011 Game Feedback - Hubs

1.

This survey is intended for BEST Hub Volunteers that participated in the 2011 competition.

It questions this group about many attributes of the 2011 game "Bugs!" and the BEST game development process.

Thank you for taking a few minutes to provide us with this valuable feedback.

*
1. What Hub do you represent?

What Hub do you represent? Bison Blazer Brazos Capitol Coastal Bend Collin County Connecticut Cowtown Crowley's Ridge Dallas Denton County Emerald Coast Galveston Georgia	Golden Lion's Heartland Heart of Texas Hot Springs Jubilee Kansas Lions Pride Little Rock Mid-South Mississippi Music City New Mexico North Alabama North Houston	North Texas NorthArk Oklahoma Philadelphia Rio Grande Valley River Valley Rocky Mountain San Antonio Space City Tennessee Valley War Eagle West Texas Wiregrass Wolverine
Other (please specify)

2. How many teams did you host in 2011?

How many teams did you host in 2011? 8

Over 30

3. Please rate your impression of the 2011 game communications?

	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)	N/A
Timeliness of information	*Please rate your impression of the 2011 game communications? Timeliness of information 1 (Poor)	Timeliness of information 2	Timeliness of information 3	Timeliness of information 4	Timeliness of information 5 (Excellent)	Timeliness of information N/A
Communication of game information	Communication of game information 1 (Poor)	Communication of game information 2	Communication of game information 3	Communication of game information 4	Communication of game information 5 (Excellent)	Communication of game information N/A
Access to game information	Access to game information 1 (Poor)	Access to game information 2	Access to game information 3	Access to game information 4	Access to game information 5 (Excellent)	Access to game information N/A
Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting)	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) 1 (Poor)	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) 2	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) 3	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) 4	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) 5 (Excellent)	Game preview (at 2010 hub directors meeting) N/A
Proto Kickoff	Proto Kickoff 1 (Poor)	Proto Kickoff 2	Proto Kickoff 3	Proto Kickoff 4	Proto Kickoff 5 (Excellent)	Proto Kickoff N/A
Proto Game	Proto Game 1 (Poor)	Proto Game 2	Proto Game 3	Proto Game 4	Proto Game 5 (Excellent)	Proto Game N/A
Online Q&A support (during prototype game)	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) 1 (Poor)	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) 2	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) 3	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) 4	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) 5 (Excellent)	Online Q&A support (during prototype game) N/A

Please explain your rating as necessary:

4. Please rate your impressions of the 2011 game "Bugs!"?

	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)	N/A
Overall impression of the game	*Please rate your impressions of the 2011 game "Bugs!"? Overall impression of the game 1 (Poor)	Overall impression of the game 2	Overall impression of the game 3	Overall impression of the game 4	Overall impression of the game 5 (Excellent)	Overall impression of the game N/A
Game theme/concept	Game theme/concept 1 (Poor)	Game theme/concept 2	Game theme/concept 3	Game theme/concept 4	Game theme/concept 5 (Excellent)	Game theme/concept N/A
Challenge to students	Challenge to students 1 (Poor)	Challenge to students 2	Challenge to students 3	Challenge to students 4	Challenge to students 5 (Excellent)	Challenge to students N/A
Game complexity	Game complexity 1 (Poor)	Game complexity 2	Game complexity 3	Game complexity 4	Game complexity 5 (Excellent)	Game complexity N/A
Teaser video	Teaser video 1 (Poor)	Teaser video 2	Teaser video 3	Teaser video 4	Teaser video 5 (Excellent)	Teaser video N/A
Game animation	Game animation 1 (Poor)	Game animation 2	Game animation 3	Game animation 4	Game animation 5 (Excellent)	Game animation N/A
Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs)	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) 1 (Poor)	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) 2	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) 3	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) 4	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) 5 (Excellent)	Documentation (drawings, rules, support docs) N/A
Field design	Field design 1 (Poor)	Field design 2	Field design 3	Field design 4	Field design 5 (Excellent)	Field design N/A
Field electronics	Field electronics 1 (Poor)	Field electronics 2	Field electronics 3	Field electronics 4	Field electronics 5 (Excellent)	Field electronics N/A
Field cost	Field cost 1 (Poor)	Field cost 2	Field cost 3	Field cost 4	Field cost 5 (Excellent)	Field cost N/A
Scoring software	Scoring software 1 (Poor)	Scoring software 2	Scoring software 3	Scoring software 4	Scoring software 5 (Excellent)	Scoring software N/A

Please explain your rating:

5. What game information is/was missing or needs improvement?

What game information is/was missing or needs improvement?

6. Please rate the following specific attributes of the 2011 game committee:

	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)	N/A
On schedule deliveries	*Please rate the following specific attributes of the 2011 game committee: On schedule deliveries 1 (Poor)	On schedule deliveries 2	On schedule deliveries 3	On schedule deliveries 4	On schedule deliveries 5 (Excellent)	On schedule deliveries N/A
Rules clarity	Rules clarity 1 (Poor)	Rules clarity 2	Rules clarity 3	Rules clarity 4	Rules clarity 5 (Excellent)	Rules clarity N/A
Documentation	Documentation 1 (Poor)	Documentation 2	Documentation 3	Documentation 4	Documentation 5 (Excellent)	Documentation N/A
Q&A responsiveness	Q&A responsiveness 1 (Poor)	Q&A responsiveness 2	Q&A responsiveness 3	Q&A responsiveness 4	Q&A responsiveness 5 (Excellent)	Q&A responsiveness N/A
Q&A clarity	Q&A clarity 1 (Poor)	Q&A clarity 2	Q&A clarity 3	Q&A clarity 4	Q&A clarity 5 (Excellent)	Q&A clarity N/A
Responsiveness to hubs	Responsiveness to hubs 1 (Poor)	Responsiveness to hubs 2	Responsiveness to hubs 3	Responsiveness to hubs 4	Responsiveness to hubs 5 (Excellent)	Responsiveness to hubs N/A

Comments:

7. Categorize the following possible components of game design:

	Must Have	Highly Desired	Likely Needed	Nice to Have	Not Needed
Teaser video	*Categorize the following possible components of game design: Teaser video Must Have	Teaser video Highly Desired	Teaser video Likely Needed	Teaser video Nice to Have	Teaser video Not Needed
Game animation	Game animation Must Have	Game animation Highly Desired	Game animation Likely Needed	Game animation Nice to Have	Game animation Not Needed
SolidWorks field models	SolidWorks field models Must Have	SolidWorks field models Highly Desired	SolidWorks field models Likely Needed	SolidWorks field models Nice to Have	SolidWorks field models Not Needed
SolidWorks eDrawings field model	SolidWorks eDrawings field model Must Have	SolidWorks eDrawings field model Highly Desired	SolidWorks eDrawings field model Likely Needed	SolidWorks eDrawings field model Nice to Have	SolidWorks eDrawings field model Not Needed
Field construction tips	Field construction tips Must Have	Field construction tips Highly Desired	Field construction tips Likely Needed	Field construction tips Nice to Have	Field construction tips Not Needed
Field setup document	Field setup document Must Have	Field setup document Highly Desired	Field setup document Likely Needed	Field setup document Nice to Have	Field setup document Not Needed
Field bill of materials (with sources)	Field bill of materials (with sources) Must Have	Field bill of materials (with sources) Highly Desired	Field bill of materials (with sources) Likely Needed	Field bill of materials (with sources) Nice to Have	Field bill of materials (with sources) Not Needed
Real-time scoring display	Real-time scoring display Must Have	Real-time scoring display Highly Desired	Real-time scoring display Likely Needed	Real-time scoring display Nice to Have	Real-time scoring display Not Needed
Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24)	Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24) Must Have	Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24) Highly Desired	Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24) Likely Needed	Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24) Nice to Have	Standard field footprint (i.e., 24x24) Not Needed
Industry/Educational theme tie-in	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Must Have	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Highly Desired	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Likely Needed	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Nice to Have	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Not Needed
Any game theme	Any game theme Must Have	Any game theme Highly Desired	Any game theme Likely Needed	Any game theme Nice to Have	Any game theme Not Needed

Identify any other potential game design components that you feel should be considered:

8. Should the game committee standardize the following?

	Yes	No
Game specific rules document format	*Should the game committee standardize the following? Game specific rules document format Yes	Game specific rules document format No
Field footprint/size	Field footprint/size Yes	Field footprint/size No
Field border design	Field border design Yes	Field border design No
Field bill of materials format	Field bill of materials format Yes	Field bill of materials format No
Scoring methodology	Scoring methodology Yes	Scoring methodology No
Tournament format	Tournament format Yes	Tournament format No
Industry/Educational theme tie-in	Industry/Educational theme tie-in Yes	Industry/Educational theme tie-in No

Please explain as necessary:

9. Would your hub ever consider a future game development?

Would your hub ever consider a future game development? Yes

Maybe

If no, why not?

10. Provide any other comments regarding game development here:

Provide any other comments regarding game development here:

form {display:none;} #jserror {text-align:center;margin-top:50px;}Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.