SurveyMonkey Powered Online Survey

A short survey for evaluation of the recent PCP Consultative Meeting held at the Commonwealth Secretariat headquarters in London from 22-24 July 2009.

Country:

Name:

Designation:

1. Programme Design:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Programme relevance – to my country situation	*1. Programme Design: Programme relevance – to my country situation Excellent	Programme relevance – to my country situation Very Good	Programme relevance – to my country situation Good	Programme relevance – to my country situation Fair	Programme relevance – to my country situation Poor
Programme relevance – to my work	Programme relevance – to my work Excellent	Programme relevance – to my work Very Good	Programme relevance – to my work Good	Programme relevance – to my work Fair	Programme relevance – to my work Poor
Logical programme sequence	Logical programme sequence Excellent	Logical programme sequence Very Good	Logical programme sequence Good	Logical programme sequence Fair	Logical programme sequence Poor
Balance of time for different topics	Balance of time for different topics Excellent	Balance of time for different topics Very Good	Balance of time for different topics Good	Balance of time for different topics Fair	Balance of time for different topics Poor
Selection of presentations/papers	Selection of presentations/papers Excellent	Selection of presentations/papers Very Good	Selection of presentations/papers Good	Selection of presentations/papers Fair	Selection of presentations/papers Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Overall Very Good	Overall Good	Overall Fair	Overall Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings, stating which parts of the programme were most useful; which parts were least useful; and which other areas/topics should have been included in the programme.

2. Programme Delivery:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of presentation content	*2. Programme Delivery: Quality of presentation content Excellent	Quality of presentation content Very Good	Quality of presentation content Good	Quality of presentation content Fair	Quality of presentation content Poor
Ability/quality of presenters	Ability/quality of presenters Excellent	Ability/quality of presenters Very Good	Ability/quality of presenters Good	Ability/quality of presenters Fair	Ability/quality of presenters Poor
Interaction between presenters and participants	Interaction between presenters and participants Excellent	Interaction between presenters and participants Very Good	Interaction between presenters and participants Good	Interaction between presenters and participants Fair	Interaction between presenters and participants Poor
Quality of handouts	Quality of handouts Excellent	Quality of handouts Very Good	Quality of handouts Good	Quality of handouts Fair	Quality of handouts Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Overall Very Good	Overall Good	Overall Fair	Overall Poor

Please comment briefly why you have given these ratings, stating which parts of the programme were well presented and which were poorly presented. What could have been done to improve these presentations?

3. Organisation and Management:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Documentation provided in advance	*3. Organisation and Management: Documentation provided in advance Excellent	Documentation provided in advance Very Good	Documentation provided in advance Good	Documentation provided in advance Fair	Documentation provided in advance Poor
Travel arrangements	Travel arrangements Excellent	Travel arrangements Very Good	Travel arrangements Good	Travel arrangements Fair	Travel arrangements Poor
Accommodation	Accommodation Excellent	Accommodation Very Good	Accommodation Good	Accommodation Fair	Accommodation Poor
Meals/Refreshments	Meals/Refreshments Excellent	Meals/Refreshments Very Good	Meals/Refreshments Good	Meals/Refreshments Fair	Meals/Refreshments Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Overall Very Good	Overall Good	Overall Fair	Overall Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings and give any suggestions as to how things could be improved:

4. Participation:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Level of participant representation	*4. Participation: Level of participant representation Excellent	Level of participant representation Very Good	Level of participant representation Good	Level of participant representation Fair	Level of participant representation Poor
Intra-group participation at the meeting	Intra-group participation at the meeting Excellent	Intra-group participation at the meeting Very Good	Intra-group participation at the meeting Good	Intra-group participation at the meeting Fair	Intra-group participation at the meeting Poor
Interaction of participants outside of the meeting	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Excellent	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Very Good	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Good	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Fair	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Overall Very Good	Overall Good	Overall Fair	Overall Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings.

5. Follow-Up Action: What follow-up action do you expect to take as a result of participating in the meeting? (Please note below.)

6. Further Comments: Do you have any other comments/ observations/ suggestions that you wish to make? (Please note below.)

form {display:none;} #jserror {text-align:center;margin-top:50px;}Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.