A short survey for evaluation of the recent PCP Consultative Meeting held at the Commonwealth Secretariat headquarters in London from 22-24 July 2009.

Country:

Name:

Designation:

1. Programme Design:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Programme relevance – to my country situation	1. Programme Design: Programme relevance – to my country situation Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Programme relevance – to my work	Programme relevance – to my work Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Logical programme sequence	Logical programme sequence Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Balance of time for different topics	Balance of time for different topics Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Selection of presentations/papers	Selection of presentations/papers Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings, stating which parts of the programme were most useful; which parts were least useful; and which other areas/topics should have been included in the programme.

2. Programme Delivery:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of presentation content	2. Programme Delivery: Quality of presentation content Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Ability/quality of presenters	Ability/quality of presenters Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Interaction between presenters and participants	Interaction between presenters and participants Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of handouts	Quality of handouts Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Please comment briefly why you have given these ratings, stating which parts of the programme were well presented and which were poorly presented. What could have been done to improve these presentations?

3. Organisation and Management:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Documentation provided in advance	3. Organisation and Management: Documentation provided in advance Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Travel arrangements	Travel arrangements Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Accommodation	Accommodation Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Meals/Refreshments	Meals/Refreshments Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings and give any suggestions as to how things could be improved:

4. Participation:

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Level of participant representation	4. Participation: Level of participant representation Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Intra-group participation at the meeting	Intra-group participation at the meeting Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Interaction of participants outside of the meeting	Interaction of participants outside of the meeting Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Overall	Overall Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Please comment briefly on why you have given these ratings.