Exit this survey
MDG Achievement Fund 5 minutes survey
1
. Profile
Profile
Resident Coordinator
Resident Coordinator Office
UN Agency Staff
Government
Spanish Cooperation
Civil Society
2
. I work in:
I work in:
Africa
Asia and the Pacific
Arab States
Europe and CIS
Latin America and the Caribbean
Headquaters
Optional: Please indicate the name of your country
3
. In general, how would you rate your experience in participating in the elaboration of:
positive
negative
did not participate
the Concept Note/s?
In general, how would you rate your experience in participating in the elaboration of: the Concept Note/s? positive
negative
did not participate
the Joint Programme/s?
the Joint Programme/s? positive
negative
did not participate
4
. In your opinion, was the process of review of concept notes:
Yes
No
transparent and fair?
In your opinion, was the process of review of concept notes: transparent and fair? Yes
No
good in providing feedback within reasonable time frame?
good in providing feedback within reasonable time frame? Yes
No
good in providing adequate comments by the technical convenor?
good in providing adequate comments by the technical convenor? Yes
No
5
. Do you consider that the proposed CN /JPs in your country have been designed with the achievement of the MDGs in mind?
Do you consider that the proposed CN /JPs in your country have been designed with the achievement of the MDGs in mind?
Yes
No
6
. Do you think the MDG Fund will contribute to: (choose as many as you feel relevant)
Do you think the MDG Fund will contribute to: (choose as many as you feel relevant)
Ensuring the participation of national counterparts in the design, implementation and evaluation of development interventions?
Increasing effectiveness in the implementation of interventions by reducing transaction costs?
Complementing other development partners initiatives in the situation assessments,logistics,communication, evaluation ?
Implementing national policy frameworks?
Providing innovation in the formulation, development and implementation of development programmes?
Improving the data collection systems and measurable results?
7
. Do you think that the submitted CN/JP has been elaborated with sufficient involvement of national stakeholders (governmental and non-governmental)?
Do you think that the submitted CN/JP has been elaborated with sufficient involvement of national stakeholders (governmental and non-governmental)?
Yes
No
8
. Did the UNCT in your country have Joint Programmes prior to the MDG Achievement Fund (joint design, formulation and M&E)?
Did the UNCT in your country have Joint Programmes prior to the MDG Achievement Fund (joint design, formulation and M&E)?
Yes
No
If yes, how many?
9
. Do you feel that all agencies participating in the formulation of the Joint Programme in each of the thematic windows had a comparative advantage?
Do you feel that all agencies participating in the formulation of the Joint Programme in each of the thematic windows had a comparative advantage?
Yes
No
10
. How would you describe the leading/facilitating role of the RC during the process of formulation of Concept Notes/ Joint Programme?
How would you describe the leading/facilitating role of the RC during the process of formulation of Concept Notes/ Joint Programme?
Lead the process
Played a facilitating role only
Delegated the process to the UNCT members
11
. In the submitted concept notes/joint programmes, did the formulation teams have sufficient capacity/skill to:
Yes
No
mainstream gender?
In the submitted concept notes/joint programmes, did the formulation teams have sufficient capacity/skill to: mainstream gender? Yes
No
mainstream indigenous and/or ethnic minority issues?
mainstream indigenous and/or ethnic minority issues? Yes
No
develop a results framework?
develop a results framework? Yes
No
develop the M&E plan?
develop the M&E plan? Yes
No
12
. In your view, how were the formats of the:
Acceptable
Require improvement
Difficult to work with
Concept Note
In your view, how were the formats of the: Concept Note Acceptable
Require improvement
Difficult to work with
Joint Programme
Joint Programme Acceptable
Require improvement
Difficult to work with
13
. Are you aware of the following?
Yes
No
MDG Achievement Fund Website
Are you aware of the following? MDG Achievement Fund Website Yes
No
Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) Website
Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) Website Yes
No
14
. Who provided you with information/support during the formulation process? In that instance, how would you rate the support received?:
sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
The Resident Coordinator Office
Who provided you with information/support during the formulation process? In that instance, how would you rate the support received?: The Resident Coordinator Office sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
Your HQ or Regional Office
Your HQ or Regional Office sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
Your Senior Management
Your Senior Management sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
The MDG-Fund Secretariat
The MDG-Fund Secretariat sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
The Multi-donor Trust Fund office
The Multi-donor Trust Fund office sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
The United Nations Development Operations Coordination Office (UNDOCO)
The United Nations Development Operations Coordination Office (UNDOCO) sufficient
insufficient
not applicable
15
. Share any comments you may have:
Share any comments you may have:
Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.