onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
Thorough Documentation
Video Tutorials
AJAX Integration
Printed Books
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Easy to Learn / Use
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
User Management / Security Features
Scalability
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Community Wiki
XML configuration files
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
SES URLs
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Commercial Support Contracts
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Thorough Documentation
Support for Procedural Techniques
Scalability
Stability
Support for OO Techniques
Community Involvement
Gentle Learning Curve
Technical Support
Extensibility (plugins)
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Gentle Learning Curve
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Extensibility (plugins)
Technical Support
Scalability
Support for OO Techniques
Stability
Thorough Documentation
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!