onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
AJAX Integration
Scalability
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Thorough Documentation
SES URLs
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Printed Books
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Easy to Learn / Use
Community Wiki
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Commercial Support Contracts
XML configuration files
User Management / Security Features
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Video Tutorials
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Gentle Learning Curve
Thorough Documentation
Scalability
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for OO Techniques
Stability
Technical Support
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Technical Support
Thorough Documentation
Community Involvement
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for OO Techniques
Scalability
Stability
Support for Procedural Techniques
Gentle Learning Curve
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!