onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
XML configuration files
Printed Books
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
AJAX Integration
User Management / Security Features
Easy to Learn / Use
Commercial Support Contracts
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Community Wiki
Video Tutorials
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Scalability
Thorough Documentation
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
SES URLs
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Gentle Learning Curve
Thorough Documentation
Support for OO Techniques
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Technical Support
Stability
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Technical Support
Community Involvement
Gentle Learning Curve
Support for Procedural Techniques
Support for OO Techniques
Stability
Extensibility (plugins)
Thorough Documentation
Scalability
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!