onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Thorough Documentation
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Video Tutorials
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
User Management / Security Features
Scalability
Commercial Support Contracts
Easy to Learn / Use
Community Wiki
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
XML configuration files
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Printed Books
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
AJAX Integration
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
SES URLs
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Community Involvement
Support for OO Techniques
Technical Support
Scalability
Thorough Documentation
Gentle Learning Curve
Extensibility (plugins)
Stability
Support for Procedural Techniques
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Stability
Community Involvement
Gentle Learning Curve
Extensibility (plugins)
Scalability
Technical Support
Thorough Documentation
Support for OO Techniques
Support for Procedural Techniques
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!