onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Commercial Support Contracts
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
SES URLs
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Easy to Learn / Use
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Thorough Documentation
Scalability
XML configuration files
Video Tutorials
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Printed Books
AJAX Integration
Community Wiki
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
User Management / Security Features
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Thorough Documentation
Stability
Gentle Learning Curve
Support for OO Techniques
Technical Support
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Stability
Technical Support
Gentle Learning Curve
Scalability
Support for Procedural Techniques
Thorough Documentation
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for OO Techniques
Community Involvement
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!