onTap Framework

1. Default Section

 
*
1. Programming Experience
*
2. Frameworks Experience
*
3. About Java I feel:
*
4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:
5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:
UndesirableNeutral / Don't KnowNice to haveImportantRequired
XML configuration files
User Management / Security Features
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Commercial Support Contracts
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Printed Books
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Easy to Learn / Use
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Community Wiki
Video Tutorials
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Thorough Documentation
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Scalability
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
AJAX Integration
SES URLs
*
6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.
*
7. I heard about the onTap framework through:
*
8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?
9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):
Don't knowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Support for Procedural Techniques
Gentle Learning Curve
Technical Support
Stability
Community Involvement
Support for OO Techniques
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins)
Thorough Documentation
10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):
Don't KnowPoorAcceptableGoodExcellent!
Extensibility (plugins)
Community Involvement
Gentle Learning Curve
Thorough Documentation
Support for Procedural Techniques
Support for OO Techniques
Scalability
Technical Support
Stability
Powered by SurveyMonkey
Check out our sample surveys and create your own now!