2nd National Symposium

This evaluation is to be completed by everyone seeking CEUs for attending the Symposium. Please complete the evaluation no later than March 7 in order to receive your 6 hours of CEUs. It is not necessary to enter your name, so your evaluation may remain anonymous if you so choose. We must receive at least 90% of evaluations completed or we will not be able to issue CEUs.

1. Please rate each Presenter

	Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part I: Capt William P Nash MD	Please rate each Presenter Part I: Capt William P Nash MD Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part II: Charles R Figley PhD	Part II: Charles R Figley PhD Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part II: Capt William P Nash MD	Part II: Capt William P Nash MD Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part III: Zahava Solomon PhD	Part III: Zahava Solomon PhD Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part IV: Albert "Skip" Rizzo PhD	Part IV: Albert "Skip" Rizzo PhD Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional
Part IV: Ken Graap, MA	Part IV: Ken Graap, MA Well Prepared/Organized	Concepts Clearly Explained	Responsiveness to Questions	Skillful in Presenting	Considerate/Professional

2. Please rate the Quality of the Program

	Program Description Accurate	New skills/knowledge acquired	Content seemed current
Part I: Today's Challenges for Research on Combat Stress Injuries	Please rate the Quality of the Program Part I: Today's Challenges for Research on Combat Stress Injuries Program Description Accurate	New skills/knowledge acquired	Content seemed current
Part II: A Model of Combat Stress Injury Management	Part II: A Model of Combat Stress Injury Management Program Description Accurate	New skills/knowledge acquired	Content seemed current
Part III: Detection an dManagement of Stress Injuries in the Combat Zone	Part III: Detection an dManagement of Stress Injuries in the Combat Zone Program Description Accurate	New skills/knowledge acquired	Content seemed current
Part IV: Virtual Reality: PTSD Exposure Therapy	Part IV: Virtual Reality: PTSD Exposure Therapy Program Description Accurate	New skills/knowledge acquired	Content seemed current

3. Please rate the Quality of the Program (continued)

	Material/Concepts well organized	Teaching level appropriate to audience	Slides/Video/Audio clear and helpful
Part I: Today's Challenges for Research on Combat Stress Injuries	Please rate the Quality of the Program (continued) Part I: Today's Challenges for Research on Combat Stress Injuries Material/Concepts well organized	Teaching level appropriate to audience	Slides/Video/Audio clear and helpful
Part II: A Model of Combat Stress Injury Management	Part II: A Model of Combat Stress Injury Management Material/Concepts well organized	Teaching level appropriate to audience	Slides/Video/Audio clear and helpful
Part III: Detection an dManagement of Stress Injuries in the Combat Zone	Part III: Detection an dManagement of Stress Injuries in the Combat Zone Material/Concepts well organized	Teaching level appropriate to audience	Slides/Video/Audio clear and helpful
Part IV: Virtual Reality: PTSD Exposure Therapy	Part IV: Virtual Reality: PTSD Exposure Therapy Material/Concepts well organized	Teaching level appropriate to audience	Slides/Video/Audio clear and helpful

4. Please rate the extent to which the course objectives were achieved.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
1. Identify at least five major challenges facing returning war fighters and their families.	Please rate the extent to which the course objectives were achieved. 1. Identify at least five major challenges facing returning war fighters and their families. Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
2. List at least one solution for each of the five challenges noted above.	2. List at least one solution for each of the five challenges noted above. Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
3. Note at least three examples of programs inside our outside the military designed to prevent or treat combat stress injuries.	3. Note at least three examples of programs inside our outside the military designed to prevent or treat combat stress injuries. Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
4. Articulate at least three advantages of virtual reality treatment programs for helping returning warfighters with combat stress injuries.	4. Articulate at least three advantages of virtual reality treatment programs for helping returning warfighters with combat stress injuries. Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree

5. The program met or exceeded expectations

The program met or exceeded expectations

6. The facility/room was comfortable

The facility/room was comfortable

7. The program was well administered

The program was well administered

8. Please tell us what you liked most about the program.

Please tell us what you liked most about the program.

9. Please tell us what you liked least about the program.

Please tell us what you liked least about the program.

10. Please tell us of any suggestions you might have for making the 3rd National Symposium even better than this year''s program.

Please tell us of any suggestions you might have for making the 3rd National Symposium even better than this year''s program.

1. Program Evaluation