CME/CPD Evaluation

1. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree.

  Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The event was well organised
Organisational staff were helpful
The audio visual was appropriate
The venue was appropriate for this event
There were sufficient opportunities to meet poster presenters
For poster presenters: my poster received adequate exposure
There were sufficient opportunities during sessions for discussion and questions
There were sufficient opportunities to network with colleagues
The quality of the speakers / faculty was excellent
The quality of the scientific / educational content was excellent
Overall, the educational event met my expectations
I would recommend this educational event to others
I will attend this educational event again
This activity increased my professional competencies
Participating in this educational event will improve my professional performance
I will make changes to my professional practice based on what I learned
The accredited content was balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias (Commercial bias is defined as a personal judgment in favor of a specific product or service of a commercial interest)

2. Please indicate if you feel the educational objectives were met.

  Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Address individual needs in compliance with their Continuous Professional Development (CPD) plan
Exchange ideas and knowledge in the field of Atherosclerosis and related cardiovascular conditions across continents, institutions, and individuals
Discuss the latest scientific advantages in the field of Atherosclerosis and related cardiovascular conditions
Identify possible programmatic collaborations to more effectively address regional, national and local responses to Atherosclerosis around the world and overcome barriers that limit access to prevention, care and services
Summarize the latest research outcomes in the field of Atherosclerosis and related cardiovascular conditions

3. Regular posters at the congress are currently displayed for viewing 2.5 days. If posters would instead be displayed in shifts, one day each shift, how would this affect your congress experience? As a delegate/poster viewer?

4. Regular posters at the congress are currently displayed for viewing 2.5 days. If posters would instead be displayed in shifts, one day each shift, how would this affect your congress experience? As a poster presenter?

5. Please indicate any topic areas or workplace challenges you'd like addressed in future events.

6. Tell us what you think! What did you like most and/or least? Anything else you wish to tell us?

Page1 / 2
 

T