Question Title

* How did you participate in this years conference?

Question Title

* CONFERENCE PROGRAM OVERALL

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
The program content was relevant to primary care teams.
Provided a valuable opportunity to share and learn about innovations, best practices and research findings to improve care and value in primary care.
Enabled me to strengthen my professional network.
What I learned and experienced will be useful in my future practice.
The poster presentations offered relevant learning opportunities.
I had enough time to visit the poster displays and exhibits.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated.
DAY 1: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2015

Question Title

* Program Components
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (8:30 – 9:30 AM)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable
AGM documents were clear + complete
Meeting provided sufficient opportunity for discussion
For each of the program components below, rate the extent to which the session:

Question Title

* A Vision for Ontario’s Primary Care Teams, with Dr. Ivy Oandasan (9:00 AM - 10:30 AM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* PROFESSION-BASED NETWORKING SESSION (10:30 AM - 12:00 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* LEADERSHIP PROGRAM (10:00 AM - 12:00 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* OPENING PLENARY (12:30 - 1:45 PM) - “Team-Based Primary Care: The Foundation of a Sustainable Health”
featuring Dr. Ed Wagner

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION A (2:30 - 3:15 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION B (3:30 - 4:15 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION C (4:30 - 5:15 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* "Bright Lights" Awards Dinner (6:30 - 8:30 PM):

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable
Was an enjoyable event
Effective way to celebrate primary care achievement
DAY 2: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2015
PROGRAM COMPONENTS
For each of the program components below, rate the extent to which the session:

Question Title

* EMR USER MEETINGS WITH VENDORS (8:00 – 9:15 AM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION D (9:30 - 10:15 AM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION E (10:45 - 11:30 AM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONCURRENT SESSION F (11:45 AM- 12:30 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CLOSING PLENARY (1:15 - 2:45 PM)

  Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Not Applicable
Had relevance for your work
Captured and maintained your interest
Had potential impact for your team

Question Title

* CONFERENCE ORGANIZING AND LOGISTICS
Please rate the conference overall:

  Poor Satifactory Good Very Good
Organization of overall conference program
Online registration process
Suitability of day, time, length of conference
Quality and location of exhibit hall
Quality of food & beverages
Quality of session rooms
Quality of hotel accommodation
GENERAL FEEDBACK

Question Title

* Did you perceive any degree of commercial bias in any part of the program?

Question Title

*

What would you like to see added, continued or removed from the conference? :

Added:

Question Title

* Continued:

Question Title

* Removed:

Question Title

* What themes, topics and speakers would you like AFHTO to consider for future conferences?

Question Title

* General comments:

Thank you for participating! Please send additional comments to info@afhto.ca or call 647-234-8605

T