Sessions 9 & 15: Private Judging in the Post-Pitt-Jolie Age
As family court systems grow increasingly congested and family law cases become more complex, more litigants are seeking solutions outside the traditional courtroom. Enter private neutrals—seasoned family law attorneys and retired judges—who are brought in to mediate, manage, and sometimes even preside over family law disputes. But in a landscape where privacy and neutrality are paramount, how can these principles truly be safeguarded? This dynamic program dives deep into the evolving role of private neutrals, uncovering the challenges and complexities of maintaining privacy and impartiality in family law proceedings. You’ll gain valuable insights as we explore how private is “private” in the age of high-stakes family litigation and the importance of protecting the process. We will examine the delicate balance of impartiality amidst complex family dynamics and professional relationships, and the ethical issues around conflict disclosures when dealing with repeat attorneys and intertwined cases. Finally, join us to consider real-world examples, strategic solutions, and candid discussions on what works—and what doesn’t—when navigating the increasingly popular path of private dispute resolution in family law.

Question Title

* 1. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure

Question Title

* 2. Based on the content of this session, I am able to: (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)

  1 2 3 4 5
1. Explain the key roles Private Neutrals play in Family Law.
2. Discuss how to properly appoint a Private Neutral.
3. Identify disclosure and recusal issues before they disrupt your case.

Question Title

* 3. Please rate presenter: Sherry Cassedy, Esq., MA (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 4. Please rate presenter: Belinda Hanson, Esq. (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 5. Please rate presenter: Hon. Roy Paul (Ret.) (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

  1 2 3 4 5
Level of knowledge and expertise
Teaching ability
Maintained my interest
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Question Title

* 6. Please rate this session presentation overall (1=Poor, 5=Excellent)

Question Title

* 7. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal)

Question Title

* 8. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree)

Question Title

* 9. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful)

Question Title

* 10. Additional Comments

T