Keynote Presentation Survey

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate the speaker:

	Excellent	Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia	Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia Excellent	Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia Good	Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia Average	Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia Fair	Susan Bastian, The University of Adelaide, Australia Poor

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	N/A
Presenter was well prepared and organized.	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Agree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Neutral	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Disagree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was well prepared and organized. N/A
Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter.	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. N/A
Presenter's style was clear and effective.	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Agree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Neutral	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Disagree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree	Presenter's style was clear and effective. N/A
Presenter stimulated interest and discussion.	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Agree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree	Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. N/A
Presenter was responsive to participants.	Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Agree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Agree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Neutral	Presenter was responsive to participants. Disagree	Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree	Presenter was responsive to participants. N/A
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Neutral	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. N/A
The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided.	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Agree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Agree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Neutral	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Disagree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Disagree	The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. N/A
Objectives were clearly stated.	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Agree	Objectives were clearly stated. Neutral	Objectives were clearly stated. Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Disagree	Objectives were clearly stated. N/A
There was a balance of theory and practice presented.	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Agree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Agree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Neutral	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Disagree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Disagree	There was a balance of theory and practice presented. N/A
Information was timely and relevant.	Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Agree	Information was timely and relevant. Agree	Information was timely and relevant. Neutral	Information was timely and relevant. Disagree	Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Disagree	Information was timely and relevant. N/A

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

N/A

Presenter was well prepared and organized.

Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree

Presenter was well prepared and organized. Agree

Presenter was well prepared and organized. Neutral

Presenter was well prepared and organized. Disagree

Presenter was well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree

Presenter was well prepared and organized. N/A

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter.

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree

Presenter was knowledgeable about subject matter. N/A

Presenter's style was clear and effective.

Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree

Presenter's style was clear and effective. Agree

Presenter's style was clear and effective. Neutral

Presenter's style was clear and effective. Disagree

Presenter's style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree

Presenter's style was clear and effective. N/A

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion.

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Agree

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree

Presenter stimulated interest and discussion. N/A

Presenter was responsive to participants.

Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Agree

Presenter was responsive to participants. Agree

Presenter was responsive to participants. Neutral

Presenter was responsive to participants. Disagree

Presenter was responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree

Presenter was responsive to participants. N/A

Visual aids were useful and appropriate.

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Agree

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Agree

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Neutral

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Disagree

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Disagree

Visual aids were useful and appropriate. N/A

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided.

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Agree

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Agree

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Neutral

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Disagree

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. Strongly Disagree

The content was consistent with the titles and abstracts provided. N/A

Objectives were clearly stated.

Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Agree

Objectives were clearly stated. Agree

Objectives were clearly stated. Neutral

Objectives were clearly stated. Disagree

Objectives were clearly stated. Strongly Disagree

Objectives were clearly stated. N/A

There was a balance of theory and practice presented.

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Agree

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Agree

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Neutral

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Disagree

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. Strongly Disagree

There was a balance of theory and practice presented. N/A

Information was timely and relevant.

Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Agree

Information was timely and relevant. Agree

Information was timely and relevant. Neutral

Information was timely and relevant. Disagree

Information was timely and relevant. Strongly Disagree

Information was timely and relevant. N/A

Keynote Presentation

Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate the speaker:

Question Title

* 2. Comments on the speaker:

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the following information: