Exit this survey

Oak Symposium

Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate each speaker. (speakers listed in presentation order)

	Excellent	Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities	Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities Excellent	Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities Good	Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities Average	Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities Fair	Tom Collins (Chair), Washington State University, Tri-Cities Poor
Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky	Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky Excellent	Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky Good	Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky Average	Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky Fair	Anthony Morris, Canton Cooperage, Kentucky Poor
Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington	Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington Excellent	Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington Good	Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington Average	Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington Fair	Jarrad Gollihue, University of Kentucky, Lextington Poor
Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France	Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France Excellent	Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France Good	Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France Average	Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France Fair	Delphine Winstel, Université de Bordeaux, France Poor
Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities	Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities Excellent	Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities Good	Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities Average	Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities Fair	Scott Frost, Washington State University, Tri-Cities Poor
Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain	Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Excellent	Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Good	Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Average	Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Fair	Ignacio Nevares, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain Poor

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the following presenter information.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Presenters were well prepared and organized.	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Neutral	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Disagree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Neutral	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Disagree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree
Presenters were responsive to participants.	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Neutral	Presenters were responsive to participants. Disagree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Neutral	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Disagree