Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page: Ratings
1. Contractor:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
21ST Century Research and Evaluations 0.0%0
Acclaris, LLC 0.0%0
AchieveGlobal 0.0%0
ADG Business and Governmental Consultants 0.0%0
Advent Group 0.0%0
A.T. Hudson & Co. 0.0%0
BAE Systems Analytical Solutions Inc. 0.0%0
BCP International Limited Corp. 0.0%0
Burns & McDonnell 0.0%0
Camber Corporation 0.0%0
Career Training Conepts, Inc. 0.0%0
Carrol Consulting, Inc. 0.0%0
Chapman Schewe – Florida, LLC 0.0%0
CMA Enterprise, Inc. 0.0%0
The Community Trust Corp. 0.0%0
Crawford Marketing & Consulting Inc. 0.0%0
Customer Centered Consulting Group 0.0%0
DWB & Associates 0.0%0
Electronic Training Solutions Inc. 0.0%0
EW Bryant Associates 0.0%0
General Physics Corporation 0.0%0
Glenn W. Robertson & Associates 0.0%0
GovConnect 0.0%0
Harvey, Branker & Associates 0.0%0
HDR, Inc. 0.0%0
ICATT Consulting, Inc. 0.0%0
Information Systems of Florida 0.0%0
James Moore & Co., P.L. 0.0%0
JEG Consultants, Inc. 0.0%0
KMR Consultants, LLC 0.0%0
KPMG LLP 0.0%0
Lampl Herbert Consultants Inc. 0.0%0
Law, Redd, Crona & Munroe 0.0%0
Levings & Associates, Inc. 0.0%0
The Manasa Consulting Group 0.0%0
Mary Key & Associates 0.0%0
Maximus 0.0%0
Mercer Human Resource Consulting 0.0%0
Michael Richardson & Associates 0.0%0
MGT of America, Inc. 0.0%0
MLC & Associates 0.0%0
Ometrius D. Long & Associates 0.0%0
PKV Management Consulting, Inc. 0.0%0
Policy Studies, Inc. 0.0%0
Public Consulting, Inc. 0.0%0
Roy Jorgensen Associates 0.0%0
Science Applications International Corporation 0.0%0
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 0.0%0
Sterling Institute 0.0%0
Testmasters, Inc. 0.0%0
The North Highland Company 0.0%0
Thomas Howell Ferguson P.A. 0.0%0
Thompson, Cobb, Bazilio & Assoc. 0.0%0
Upper Mohawk, Inc. 0.0%0
The World of Production 0.0%0

2. Contractor Performance
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Fails to Meet Most Requirements (1 Point)Fails to Meet 1 or 2 Requirements (2 Points)Meets Requirements (3 Points)Exceeds Requirements (4 Points)Outstanding Performance (5 Points)Rating
Average		Response
Count
Performance to Specifications0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Delivery0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Invoicing0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Customer Service0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000

3. State Purchasing Performance
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Poor (1 Point)Needs Improvement (2 Points)Satisfactory (3 Points)Good (4 Points)Excellent (5 Points)Rating
Average		Response
Count
Pricing0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Ease of Use0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Product Selection & Quality0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Customer Service0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000

4. Please comment, if any rating is other than "Meets Requirements" or "Satisfactory".
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

5. How can this contract be improved?
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

Page: Customer Information
6. Name:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

7. E-Mail:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

8. Phone:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

9. Agency:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Count
0

10. Would you like State Purchasing to contact you?
 answered question0
 
skipped question
4
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes 0.0%0
No 0.0%0