Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page: Ratings
1. Contractor:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Affordable Interior Systems, Inc. 0.0%0
Allseating 0.0%0
Allsteel, Inc. 0.0%0
Artopex Plus, Inc. 0.0%0
CompuChair 0.0%0
Canadian Atlas Furniture Corp. 0.0%0
Cramer 0.0%0
Dauphin North America 0.0%0
Design Options 0.0%0
DMI Office Furniture 0.0%0
EckAdams 0.0%0
Ergogenesis (Bodybilt) 0.0%0
Executive Office Concepts 0.0%0
Flex-Y-Plan Ind., Inc. 0.0%0
Global Ind., Inc. 0.0%0
GF Office Furniture, LTD 0.0%0
Groupe Lacasse 0.0%0
Gunlocke Company 0.0%0
Harter 0.0%0
Haworth, Inc. 0.0%0
Herman Miller, Inc. 0.0%0
HighMark 0.0%0
High Point Furniture Ind., Inc. 0.0%0
Hon Company 0.0%0
Howe 0.0%0
Humanscale Corp. 0.0%0
Indiana Desk Co. 0.0%0
Inwood Office Furniture 0.0%0
ISE. Inc. 0.0%0
Jofco, Inc. 0.0%0
JSI/Community 0.0%0
Kimball International 0.0%0
Knoll, Inc. 0.0%0
Krueger International (KI) 0.0%0
Krug, Inc. 0.0%0
La-Z-Boy, Inc. 0.0%0
Mayline Company 0.0%0
Miller Casegoods & Seating 0.0%0
Montisa Office Furniture 0.0%0
Netural Posture, Inc. 0.0%0
Nova Solutions, Inc. 0.0%0
Office Specialty 0.0%0
OFS 0.0%0
Omni International, Inc. 0.0%0
Paoli, Inc. 0.0%0
Pride Enterprises 0.0%0
Rosemount Office Systems, Inc. 0.0%0
Sit On It Seating 0.0%0
Sitmatic 0.0%0
Smed International 0.0%0
Source International 0.0%0
Southern Metal 0.0%0
Standard Desk 0.0%0
Steelcase, Inc. 0.0%0
Stylex, Inc. 0.0%0
Superior Furniture/izzydesign 0.0%0
Symbiote, Inc. 0.0%0
Tab Products Co. 0.0%0
Teknion 0.0%0
Trendway Corp. 0.0%0
Vecta 0.0%0
Via 0.0%0
Viking Acoustical Corp. 0.0%0
WorkRite 0.0%0
Writeline 0.0%0

2. Contractor Performance
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Fails to Meet Most Requirements (1 Point)Fails to Meet 1 or 2 Requirements (2 Points)Meets Requirements (3 Points)Exceeds Requirements (4 Points)Outstanding Performance (5 Points)Rating
Average		Response
Count
Performance to Specifications0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Delivery0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Invoicing0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Customer Service0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000

3. State Purchasing Performance
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Poor (1 Point)Needs Improvement (2 Points)Satisfactory (3 Points)Good (4 Points)Excellent (5 Points)Rating
Average		Response
Count
Pricing0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Ease of Use0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Product Selection & Quality0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000
Customer Service0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.000

4. Please comment, if any rating is other than "Meets Requirements" or "Satisfactory".
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

5. How can this contract be improved?
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

Page: Customer Information
6. Name:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

7. E-Mail:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

8. Phone:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

9. Agency:
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Count
0

10. Would you like State Purchasing to contact you?
 answered question0
 
skipped question
19
 Response
Percent		Response
Count
Yes 0.0%0
No 0.0%0