| 1. What type of organization do you represent? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Local jurisdiction, city, county | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Regional transportation planning organization | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Transit agency | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Employer | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Retail center | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Tribal transportation planner | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Association, nonprofit, environmental, or advocacy group | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 2. Where is your organization located? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Clark County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| King County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Kitsap County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Pierce County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Snohomish County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Spokane County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Thurston County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Whatcom County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Yakima County | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 3. Will your organization be required to participate in the modified CTR program? To see the list of jurisdictions required to participate in the modified CTR program , please refer to this list. |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes, my city or county is required to participate | | 0.0% | 0 |
| yes, my RTPO is required to participate | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Yes, my employer is required to participate | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No, my city, county, tribal government, or employer is not required to participate, but we may still voluntarily participate in CTR | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No, my city, county, tribal government or employer is not required to participate, and we aren't planning to participate | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 4. How involved have you been in rule development for the new CTR law? (check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| I have read the draft rules | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I attended a briefing or heard a presentation about the CTR Efficiency Act | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I attended a workshop on the CTR Efficiency Act | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I am on the CTR email announcement list | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I have read about the modified CTR program | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I have seen the CTR Efficiency Act Web site | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I have participated in rule development meetings | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I heard about the CTR Efficiency Act from a peer or coworker | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I didn’t even know the CTR program will change | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
Page: I. Local and Regional CTR Planning
| 5. How well does your jurisdiction currently integrate the CTR program with its comprehensive planning? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Very well | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Well | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Fairly well | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Not so well | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Poorly | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 6. What are the existing conflicts between your local jurisdiction’s CTR program and comprehensive plan? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 7. How well do the draft CTR planning rules help you address any existing conflicts between your local jurisdiction’s CTR program and comprehensive plan? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 8. What are you or your local jurisdiction likely to do to address the conflicts between the CTR program and the comprehensive plan? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 9. What are the ways you would suggest that CTR can be better integrated into the local planning process? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 10. What, if any, are your concerns with the local CTR plan requirements, as detailed in the draft CTR rules? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 11. What do you expect the outcomes of RTPO involvement in CTR will be? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| CTR and TDM more visible as a regional transportation strategy | | 0.0% | 0 |
| CTR given a higher priority in regional funding allocations | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Better coordination of CTR plans, services and investment across jurisdictions in a region | | 0.0% | 0 |
| More oversight of local CTR plans and administration | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Unnecessary limitations on local CTR plan and program | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Additional layer complexity that doesn’t add value | | 0.0% | 0 |
| More efficient and effective CTR program | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Achievement of regional transportation plan goals | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 12. What, if any, are your concerns with the regional CTR plan requirements, as detailed in the draft CTR rules? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
Page: II. Goals and Measurement
| 13. I think the SOV and VMT targets are ... |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Way too low | | 0.0% | 0 |
| A bit low | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Just right | | 0.0% | 0 |
| A bit high | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Way too high | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 14. Do you envision your jurisdiction establishing the minimum target or going for a higher target? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Minimum target | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Higher target | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 15. The state will evaluate the minimum state targets every four years to determine whether they are attainable in each jurisdiction. What services and policies will be needed in your jurisdiction to meet the established targets? (Select your top three choices.) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | First priority | Second priority | Third priority | Rating Average | Response Count |
|---|
| More transit service to support major employer worksites | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| More amenities to support non-motorized travel | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| More HOV infrastructure (park and ride lots, HOV lanes, etc) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| Land use changes to promote non-SOV travel, including changes in local parking regulations, streetscape standards, etc. | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| Additional local funding for transportation demand management strategies | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| Enhanced pricing policies for parking, roadways, and other facilities | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| Other | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.00 | 0 |
| 16. What approach to setting employer targets would you like your jurisdiction to take? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Same target for every employer | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Different targets for employers, based on local transportation needs and services | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 17. Do you think this flexibility will help your jurisdiction work with employers to meet CTR targets? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No, and let me tell you why: | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 18. Jurisdictions have the flexibility to create residential-based CTR programs. While employers would still have worksite targets, the progress of residential programs could be added to the employer progress to meet the area’s overall targets for SOV and VMT.
Would your city or county be interested in exploring a residential program in order to meet the area target? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
Page: III. Jurisdiction Opt-In
| 19. If your city or county is not required to participate in CTR, is there interest in opting in to the program? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| My city or county is already required to participate in CTR | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 20. If yes, why? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| CTR helps my city or county address our air quality issues | | 0.0% | 0 |
| My city or county has adopted targets for reductions in greenhouse gases and CTR will help us meet our targets | | 0.0% | 0 |
| My city or county is growing quickly and CTR will help as a proactive strategy for managing growth | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Employers in my city or county are engaged in transportation issues and CTR will provide a framework for their support and involvement | | 0.0% | 0 |
| My city or county will likely be required to participate in the future as delay grows in the highway system in my area | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 21. If not, why not? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Not needed in my area | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Lack of resources to develop a CTR program | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 22. Tribal governments are not required to participate in CTR, but the state encourages them to develop CTR plans and programs. Tribes that choose to opt-in to the program will receive technical assistance from the state.
If you are a tribal transportation planner, do you think your tribal government would be interested in developing a CTR plan program?
|
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not a tribal transportation planner | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 23. Why or why not? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
Page: IV. Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers (GTECs)
| 24. How familiar are you with the GTEC concept so far? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Never heard of it | | 0.0% | 0 |
| The concept sounds somewhat familiar – I’ve heard of “centers” before | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I've heard of the GTEC idea, but I have some questions | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I’m well informed on GTEC ideas | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 25. The GTEC program is voluntary. Do you think your area would be interested in designating a GTEC in 2007? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I'm not sure | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 26. Why or why not? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 27. If your jurisdiction were to establish a GTEC, would it be focused on employers, neighborhoods, or a combination of both? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Employers | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Neighborhoods | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Combination of both | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I don't know | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 28. If your jurisdiction were to establish a GTEC, what types of strategies would it use to meet its targets? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Changes in development policies and regulations | | 0.0% | 0 |
| New services, facilities, and amenities | | 0.0% | 0 |
| New marketing and incentives | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 29. If your jurisdiction were to establish a GTEC, what type of organization would be best suited to administer the program in your area? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Local jurisdiction | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Transit agency | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent contractor | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Transportation management association | | 0.0% | 0 |
| WSDOT | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I don't know | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 30. The purpose of the draft GTEC rules is to provide a consistent framework for local jurisdictions to implement comprehensive plans, development regulations, and transportation investments that support population growth and economic development, transportation-efficient land uses, and transportation demand management strategies in the state’s key employment and residential centers.
Do you have any concerns about the content of the draft GTEC rules? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Yes, and here are the issues: | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 31. Do you think the jurisdiction in your area would pursue an exemption? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Yes | | 0.0% | 0 |
| No | | 0.0% | 0 |
| I don’t know | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 32. If yes, why? (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| Area is a residential community with few major employers, so employer-based CTR doesn’t address local needs (Please note that the CTR Efficiency Act allow jurisdictions to develop residential programs to meet their area goals. Jurisdictions may also establish customized programs as part of a Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center.) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Minimal contribution of area to delay on state highways | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Perception of little or no benefits provided by CTR to community | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |
| 33. What questions do you have about the draft CTR rules that are unanswered? |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 34. Please provide additional feedback on any of the draft rules or the implementation process: |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Count |
|---|
| 0 |
| 35. Please tell us how you heard about this survey. (Check all that apply) |
|---|
| | answered question | 0 |
|---|
| skipped question | 74 |
|---|
| | Response Percent | Response Count |
|---|
| CTR News listserv | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Forwarded the email | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Link on the CTR Efficiency Act Web site | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Attended a briefing or workshop | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Heard about it from a colleague | | 0.0% | 0 |
| Other (please specify) | | 0.0% | 0 |